Gor (1988)

reviewed by
ecl@mtgzy.att.com (Moderator)


[The author of this review wishes to remain anonymous. Can you blame her/him? -Moderator]

                                    GOR
                       A film review by Jack Shadow
                        Copyright 1989 Jack Shadow

Twenty-one novels or so ago, a chap "named" John Norman starting writing a series of Edgar-Rice-Burroughs-style adventure novels set on a counter-Earth (opposite the Earth on the other side of the Sun). They had titles like TARNSMAN OF GOR and RAIDERS OF GOR. Much as in ERB's classic Mars series, the Goreans possessed an unlikely mix of high and low technology, combining spaceships and perfect birth control with swords. A relatively minor part of the background was slavery, as is frequently the case with hack-work adventure novels.

This continued for five novels or so, and Mr. Norman achieved some recognition as a writer of more or less enjoyable escapist adventure literature. At some point about the fifth novel what had been a few lines describing a slave being chained, whipped, or branded became a few pages ... and then an entire chapter. The Gor series became an open secret - the only source of soft-porn S&M material at Waldenbooks. Fortunately for Mr. Norman, Falwell and Robinson have for some reason neglected his publisher, DAW Books, and the owner of DAW is apparently well pleased with the Gor series. Rumor has it that the Gor profits more or less pay for all the innovative, low-profit, high-quality SF published by DAW Books.

The recent Gor movie must be viewed against this background. Some may have hoped for a decent action-adventure film while others for a bevy of beauties in chains. Both are sadly disappointed. The Gor film, is, to quote one critic, "a travesty of a mediocrity." Gone are the SF/fantasy elements of the novels (spaceships, alien priest-kings, tarns, etc.). Instead a magical stone transports our hero (Tarl Cabot) to Gor where he quickly becomes an amazing fighter in spite of a total lack of prior experience. The plot vaguely resembles some elements of the novels, but only to a point. There are some dancing slaves, but nothing like the preponderance in the novels. There is a plot, but it makes even less sense than that found in the novels, and at the end Cabot is returned to Earth via the "homestone" where he knocks down a beach-bully-type with his new-found skills.

My personal nomination for the most gratuitous scene involves the main characters sneaking though a cave. They come upon a blond woman in chains. One character says to another, "She has the dread disease narcosis. Terrible, isn't it?" or words to that effect. They move on and nothing further is said of the "dread disease." Lest you get the idea that although this is a bad film with a silly plot these flaws are compensated for by the presence of hordes of nubile slaves, I feel compelled to point out that this is the one of a very small number of such scenes in the entire movie.

Did I mention the poor acting? No? Well, there is plenty of bad acting as well. There is also a sequel, strongly but illogically hinted at by the final scene of the movie. This is definitely a (-2) movie, verging on (-3).


The review above was posted to the rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due to ASCII to HTML conversion.

Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews