Flubber (1997)

reviewed by
Chad Polenz


Flubber
Chad'z rating: * (out of 4 = poor)

1997, PG, 93 minutes [1 hour, 33 minutes]

[comedy]

starring: Robin Williams (Phillip Brainard), Marcia Gay Harden (Sara Jean Reynolds), Jodi Benson (voice of Weebo), Christopher McDonald (Wilson Croft); written by John Hughes, Bill Walsh; produced by John Hughes; directed by Les Mayfield; based on the screenplay "The Absent Minded Professor" by Bill Walsh.

Seen December 2, 1997 at 6:50 p.m. at The Glenwood Movieplex Cinemas (Oneida, NY), theater #3, by myself for free (free pass). [Theater rating: ***: good seats, sound, and picture]

There are many philosophies as to why we are so fascinated with cartoons. They provide a method of total escapism in which anything will work within their context, from the outrageous slapstick of Looney Tunes to the intensity of Japanimation. Watching "Flubber" really clinched this idea for me, because it's just a live action cartoon that presents itself as a regular comedy. It proves how painfully unfunny all those gags and slapstick would be in reality, and how important it is to actually have a story.

The film wastes no time in establishing its lighthearted, cartoony atmosphere. We meet Medfield College chemistry professor Phillip Brainard (Williams), the typical, supposedly likable mad scientist. Within the first 10 minutes we get at least a half dozen jokes about how forgetful he is. Phillip's memory loss seems less like a cartoony gag and more like a real case of Alzhiemer's Disease - isn't this rather lowbrow comedy? He starts teaching chemistry after walking in on a nude figure drawing class (an inappropriate joke for a kids' movie if I ever saw one). We learn he has stood his up fiancee, Sara (Harden), twice at the altar simply because he's forgotten. Sara claims to love him, but says if he forgets the wedding again she'll stop loving him (a sign of childish attitude the film denies it has).

But even cartoons must have conflicts to resolve, and it's no surprise the major conflicts here are related. Christopher McDonald does and even worse version of his usual villain shtick as Wilson Croft, a scientist who not only wants to steal Phillip's ideas, but his woman too. What's worse is that Sara actually seems interested in him! Wilson works for a rival college that wants to buy out Medfield, which is going broke, unless Phillip can invent something to save the day.

One of the first rules of filmmaking is to make sure the title has something to do with the film. The flubber is played for gags after it is introduced, but is all but forgotten about thereafter. It's obvious Phillip is going to accidentally invent flubber, a flying rubber compound that yields tremendous energy, and the promotions make the flubber look realistic and funny. Unfortunately, the flubber, like all the special effects in this film, looks very fake and unconvincing. Flubber also seems to have intelligence and a personality, and by the time it performs a song and dance routine, you give up wondering how life could spontaneously come to an inanimate object.

Most of the film wanders aimlessly as it relies on the flubber to make for the comedy (since Phillip's absent-mindedness is forgotten about) and somehow push the story along. But it's clear how weak this premise is from the get-go and the film just gets worse. All the jokes involve people getting hit by fast-moving, flubber-powered objects including: bowling balls; flying cars that don't fly well; and a basketball team capable of jumping 100 feet into the air. It's all presented with complete logic, and no one believes flubber exists even when they see it with their own eyes. During the basketball scene, the coach for the rival team actually says, "I think they might be cheating," to which the referee replies, "There's no rules about jumping too high."

"Predictable" doesn't begin to describe the motions the film goes through, especially after the halfway point. And it's not how terribly contrived the plot is, it's the way it's broken down scene-by-scene, with absolutely no transition. Not only that, but all the actors here, especially Williams, seem bored to tears. I'd say 80 percent of all the scenes were shot with a bluescreen, so it's almost forgivable when you realize they're talking to nothing and interacting with nothing.

It's safe to say everything that could be bad about "Flubber" is. The only original element the film has is the world's first romance between a machine and a human. But this aspect is quite twisted if you think about it, and, like the rest of the film, you won't.


The review above was posted to the rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due to ASCII to HTML conversion.

Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews