Review: Gattaca (1997)
by Luke Buckmaster
To model a human's DNA would be the ultimate of playing God - and director Andrew Nicol pretends its all ahead of us "in the not too distant future." But in the cold world of Gattaca, a society that creates a race of "super" people, the word "perfection" has been taken one step too far.
Any person who enters the world from a "faith birth" (without use of DNA structuring) becomes known as an "In Valid", an outcast who often will end up with the lowest possible occupation and living conditions. As the movie so bluntly states, it's technically not discrimination - but who would hire an In Valid over a person structured to perfection? This is one of the many themes that is raised in the most engrossing Science Fiction film this year, that not only presents us with raw creativity and imagination but also intelligence and emotion on equal terms.
The film follows the narrative life of Vincent Freeman (Ethan Hawke), a child born the old fashioned way; with values and morals that would be respected in the 90's but scorned at in the society of Gattaca. At the time of his birth Vincent's life expectancy was estimated at a lousy 30 years; so after discovering this and realizing that he would have to live the life of a third rate citizen, his parents agree for genetics to decide the fate of his future brother Hugo. Once Hugo is "born", Vincent begins to realize just weak he is, and despite his never ending determination to function successfully in society he is continuously outclassed and outmatched by people who proclaim that there is no way to defy genetics. Luckily for Vincent, there is no gene for the human spirit.
As Vincent grows up, and his desire for social acceptance is spurred on by his dream to be an astronaut, he realizes that the only way to hide his identity is to borrow someone else's. Enter Jeromre, a very contrasting character to Vincent, who was structured as an extraordinarily high-class citizen - perfect in every way. But, after a failed suicide attempt, Jerome is left a paraplegic and is now useless in Gattaca's unforgiving society. Deciding to cash in on his injury, Jerome forfeits his identity to Vincent for a large paycheck that will ensure a comfortable life for him.
Of course with every person there is unique DNA and blood types, so Vincent quickly learns to follow a set of important activities to ensure that his identity remains a secret. Brushing as much hair as possible off his body, using Jerome's blood and vicariously cleaning everything around him soon become necessary for survival and placement amongst the society which surrounds him.
Vincent soon becomes attracted to fellow worker Sally Ed (Uma Thurman), a beautiful young women with a terminal heart disease. A lively romantic subplot emerges between these two characters, and as Vincent becomes more and more desperate to conceal his identity their relationship will almost certainly end in disaster.
But Gattaca has much more in stall for viewers than just a Sci Fi drama with a romantic flavor - twists and developments in its story provide constant entertainment of a fulfilling and rewarding kind.
The claustrophobic and all too modern sets of Gattaca give an eerie representation of Niccol's futuristic world, perhaps making you feel that this sort of place may be around the corner - but it's impossible - impossible tell you, for anything like Gattaca to ever exist. The very thought of DNA structuring society is laughable, however the illustrious mind of Niccol surely has created something truly special in a genre which surely produces more mindless duds then masterpieces. So Gattaca's basic idea may appear to be a little silly - who cares? It is not so much a film's plot that makes it great; rather the way it is executed, and although this film doesn't score many brownie points in believability it more than makes it up with maturity and style.
Many may argue that this "believability" factor is it's ultimate downfall, but anyone who does not have the imagination to fill in the blanks should steer clear of Gattaca all together.
For example in Steven Spielberg's Jurassic Park, we almost believed that rampaging dinosaurs could exist - simply because the exact theory behind it was presented from the start and shown in a society we can recognize and relate with. But Gattaca quite obviously steers clear from all the hows and whys, and presents us not with theories, beliefs and assumptions, but with cold hard imagination and a touch of wonder.
The all-important question - is this necessarily bad? For the scientific minded perhaps yes - but those who value physiological effects more than absent minded mathematics will appreciate Gattaca's character's on going relationships and the way they react in a society obsessed with perfection.
When creating a film, it is one thing to hand out emotion on a platter (ala Jerry Maguire, where the movie's surroundings allow for a loving relationship between certain characters), but where the basic setting is a cold and unforgiving society it is entirely different. It truly takes skill to produce characters that people care about, situations which people think about and issues that people can relate with when apparent boundaries are set. Andrew Nicol does this beautifully, and not for one minute does the science side of things replace Gattaca's superb story and its brilliance in fabulously crafted scenes.
As an avid fan of numerous reviewers, it has been bluntly obvious to me that many different opinions have been expressed about this film - a film that does something different, strays off the track of clichi characters and events and presents us with something truly brilliant indeed. If you are able to open your mind and absorb only a fraction of what Gattaca has to offer, a very memorial experience is to be had. Its still early days but I have no doubt in proclaiming Gattaca as one of the best films of 1997.
5 stars out of 5 Daring to be different, Gattaca stands strong as a modern masterpiece.
The review above was posted to the
rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the
review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright
belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due
to ASCII to HTML conversion.
Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews