Lost in Space (1998) 124 min.
If any recent trend can bear witness to the all-too-often voiced complaint that Hollywood has run out of ideas, then it is the recycling of 1960s television shows into big-budget, star-powered cinema updates. It's jump-on-the-bandwagon thinking, of that there is no doubt, but unlike other recent trends - the 'based on video game' film, the 'return to the 70s disaster flicks', the 'make a movie from anything by Jane Austen' mini-booms - this bandwagon looks set to roll on for some time yet. Why is this happening, and why now? It could be said that this flood of old television to the box-office is less a process of revivifying our cultural past than colonizing it - the simple fact that we are in a position to look back gives us the right for enlightened comment and critique. Or it could be some kind of fin-de-siecle anxiety, harrying us to polish and repackage these old shows before they are looked back on as some potentially embarrassing remnant of the 20th century (Oh yeah, we knew that show was stupid, but look, we made this out of it to prove that we knew). It's really more simple than either of these ideas: these TV makeovers are Hollywood's way of saying Yes, we know we've run out of ideas, we're just not trying to hide it any more, and you'd better get used to it because the Baby Boomers are running this asylum now, and we grew up with these old shows, so you're going to take this reheated hash and scarf it up just the same way you've always done, without any need for us to apologise for it. Because, folks, postmodernism means never having to say you're sorry.
This kind of honesty is almost beyond criticism. It's Hollywood waving its flag and saying, Look Ma, no ideas! So, for the most part, we've shut up and treated these films as the harmless reminiscences they inevitably turn out to be. Their treatment is wholly predictable: part revision, part homage, all marketing. But a few exceptions have slipped through the net: Betty Thomas' necessarily cruel (but affectionate - you can be as iconoclastic as you like with this nostalgia as long as you stay affectionate) repositioning of THE BRADY BUNCH; and Brian De Palma's take on MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE, which saw the Impossible Missions Force blown away in the first scene (a move which several people were not pleased with, because with that one cavalier stroke, De Palma demonstrated that he was sadly lacking in that all-important affection for the original).
Which brings us to LOST IN SPACE, and another problem concerning TV remakes, for it is impossible to separate the cinema experience from the historical product that has imprinted its own identity so firmly in our culture. LOST IN SPACE was originally intended to be serious science-fiction but descended into camp once Jonathan Harris (Dr Smith, a murderous saboteur who was meant to be written out after half a dozen episodes) started getting the most of the show's fan mail. Soon LOST IN SPACE became nothing more than 'The Dr Smith, Will Robinson, and Robot Show', and as the budget became skimpier (which explains why they would spend a whole season on the same planet, then take off and land on another planet with the same rocks arranged differently) and the not-very-special effects even cheaper, the once-serious concept took on a wayward surrealism unprecedented in prime-time TV. In fact, for many young viewers the show's absurdity made it frightening. LOST IN SPACE went beyond all logic and thus into the territory of nightmare. One particularly terrifying episode (for me, anyway) found Will and Doctor Smith in a fog-shrouded minimalist street set of Chinatown talking about buying hot dogs while oversized spiders lay lurking in the dark. With a memory of the show as vivid as that, how could any belated cinema remake stand alone?
Nevertheless, the 1998 LOST IN SPACE manages to pull off this balancing act, and it does it by returning to the show's roots. It may be affectionate, spirited, even respectful in an odd sort of way, but most importantly it manages to do what its television predecessor could not - have the muscle to back up its intentions. Its most apparent strength is the special effects, not only in quality but also sheer volume - this is one of the most FX-saturated movies you're likely to have seen in some time. It's strange that the 'biological' effects - i.e. monsters and critters in general - don't hold up as well as the rest, but in a strange way it is reflective of the monsters in the original show, which were just plain lousy (Look! There's a woman with her face painted green! Look! There's a guy wearing a sparkly bowler hat and a stocking over his head!) The second strength the 1998 version has is Akiva Goldsman's script, which manages to employ several motifs and undercurrents of the show without making them obvious in-jokes or necessary prerequisites with which to 'appreciate' the update. There are spins on the businesslike space-pioneer 'give-me-a-hand-with-the-force-field-Don' relationship (or nonrelationship) between John Robinson and Don West; the friendship/bonding between Will and the Robot; and most dramatically, the unspoken (but apparent to those of us who were regular viewers of the series) surrogate father relationship Will had with Dr Smith - which in this version is pursued to a horrible conclusion the original producers could never have foreseen.
Fine so far, but will the fans like it? Fandom is a difficult demographic. The elements of the series held in most affection will be the same ones which most pointedly fail to deliver for several viewers on several levels, but the most common point of focus will be the replacement of new actors for old. Who, for example, could possibly replace Jonathan Harris as Doctor Smith? I wouldn't have thought it would have been Gary Oldman, but he does a creditable job. Jack Johnson similarly slips comfortably into the role of Will. I suspect it may be Lacey Chabert's portrayal of Penny that will rankle many fans (pure prejudice on my part, since I had an enormous crush on Angela Cartwright as a kid), whose character does admittedly become more engaging and less whiny as the film goes on, but what does she keep complaining about? At least the Robinsons have to be a step up from the PARTY OF FIVE family she's been stuck with for the last five years. Perversely, it is the only non-human character of the series that is the most significantly irreplaceable. Hearing the voice of Dick Tufeld, the only actor from the original to reprise his role (the Robot) in the film, provides viewers with the most immediate nostalgic experience that LOST IN SPACE has to offer - that, and I suppose the revamped title theme played over the end credits (not the show's more memorable original theme, however - remember, it had two!) The only major departure from prewritten characterization would be Don, as played by Matt LeBlanc - really, it's just another version of his character Joey from FRIENDS - but it's a perversely satisfying change: at last we get to see Don hitting on John and Maureen Robinson's cute older daughter Judy. And about time.
I'm wary of making a comment as general as 'Fans of the TV show will love LOST IN SPACE', because being the first kid on the block to see it I haven't yet had a chance to compare reactions. But I can say personally that as a fan of the show I was enormously satisfied with what the film-makers had done. LOST IN SPACE works. It is able to exist on its own terms as an imaginative and active space adventure, while still catering to fans of the original. I'd go as far as saying that it is the most enjoyable adaptation of a TV show I have yet seen. But once again, this is prejudice on my part - I can't think of many other shows (well, GET SMART was one) which spawned as many catch-phrases in the school playground. Most of them came from Smith, whether it was "The pain, the paaaiin" (usually when filing out for a PE lesson) or anything ending with "Dear boy" (I'm sure also that many teachers must have gotten sick of kids responding "Never fear, Smith is here" whenever they were appointed with some minor classroom task). However, as much as I enjoyed Smith I have to say it was Don who made me laugh the most when I revisited the show a decade or so ago. Humorless Don, who for all appearances seemed to be a walking clockspring of repressed rage, and who could never speak to Smith without snarling ("You're a 24-carat goldbrick!"), was where we could see the reality outside the show intrude into its own peculiar universe; for this was Don-the-actor voicing on behalf of the rest of the Robinson Family with every snarl his extreme vexation about being relegated to the periphery while a camp old ham merrily stole the show right from under them. It makes you think about why Jonathan Harris was one of the few original cast members not to get a walk-on this time around.
The series LOST IN SPACE has become something of an institution now. Some may ask why any studio would bother to make an enormously expensive movie of a flimsy low-budget show thirty years later. Fans will reply that it has been a remake that has been too long in coming. The facts, according to the original show, stated that the Robinsons blasted off into space on October 16, 1997. It's a shame the film's producers couldn't have arranged for their debut to coincide with date and bring the whole LOST IN SPACE phenomenon full circle. As it stands, this new telling of that story has wisely reset the launch date to September 30, 2058. I guess we can look forward to Hollywood's next onslaught of television remakes - remakes of remakes, in fact - around about that time.
The review above was posted to the
rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the
review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright
belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due
to ASCII to HTML conversion.
Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews