GODZILLA Reviewed by Jamie Peck
"Godzilla"'s creative team is that of director/co-writer Roland Emmerich and producer/co-writer Dean Devlin, the duo who gave us "Independence Day" only two years ago. I was in the small clique of those who did not appreciate that film (I hated it, actually), having felt that its every aspect was blatantly forced -- a cardboard cast of stereotyped personalities use a jingoistic tone to cover up a story that refuses to admit how infuriatingly silly it is. "Godzilla," while oh so very far from being a good movie, is much more grounded than "ID4"; it only momentarily masquerades as something it isn't. Sure, both films offer ineffective, one-dimensional characterization (though, judging from "Godzilla"'s press notes, the filmmakers would argue otherwise), but mostly gone here is the clunky, laughable human drama and conflict that, for me, sank "ID4" to a surprising low.
A plot summary is largely superfluous, but I shall proceed for those few of you who want to know what kind of narrative thrust this baby has. Matthew Broderick plays Nick Tatopoulos, a biological scientist studying the nuclear radiation-induced mutations of creatures great and small, the latter being earthworms and the former a mysterious creature that's swimming from Polynesia to the United States, and leaving all kinds of havoc in its wake. This entity, of course, turns out to be the titular behemoth, and Nick is hot on its trail when it decides to crash -- literally and figuratively -- in the Big Apple. The military, having never before faced such a deadly adversary, isn't very helpful. Complicating matters further is the presence of Nick's ex-flame, plucky local TV journalist Audrey (Maria Pitillo), but the last thing a movie like this needs is a rekindled-romance subplot.
To be fair, however, the Nick-Audrey relationship is no less silly than the Jeff Goldblum-Margaret Colin one in "Independence Day"; "Godzilla"'s "love story" is less a glaring flaw than a minor distraction. So, instead of copying its predecessor's flaws to a T, it invents some new ones. Devlin and Emmerich play down the malevolence and up the sympathy in "Godzilla," so much to the point where one really wonders if the king of all monsters can truly be called an antagonist. Gone is the sense of deliberate, careless destruction that characterize this movie's Japanese ancestors; by "humanizing" the beast, we're torn when it comes time to root for somebody -- or against something. Also sorely missed is the sense of fascination, wonder and pseudo-credibility that Steven Spielberg used to distinguish his "Jurassic Park," a film that "Godzilla" will be inevitably compared to, from just another ride.
Yet some strong key assets keep "Godzilla" far from being a total downer. The special effects (the unarguable reason that this film was made) are fantastic, and the movie's look -- especially in the helicopter chase scenes -- often works on a Tim Burton-level of dazzle. Some of Emmerich's action sequences, like the climactic cab ride, offer sudden, genuine bursts of excitement. "Godzilla" even has a notable sense of humor (mostly courtesy of comic co-star Hank Azaria), save for one running joke that's funny at first but gets old fast. The gag in question pokes fun at film critic deities Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert, allegedly because Devlin and Emmerich are not too happy about the negative write-ups they gave "StarGate" and "ID4." The best way to get revenge against reviewers for disliking your previous movies isn't to gibe them in your current work, guys -- it's to make sure that current work is a great film.
The review above was posted to the
rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the
review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright
belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due
to ASCII to HTML conversion.
Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews