In a summer full of overlong epics like "Armageddon" and "The Mask of Zorro," a modest quickie like "Halloween: H2O - Twenty Years Later" seems refreshingly unpretentious. It takes almost as long to pronounce that unwieldly title as it does to watch the movie. But here's a case in which brevity is something of a handicap. There are actually some intriguing issues bubbling just below the blood-spattered surface of "H2O," which brings back Jamie Lee Curtis of the original two "Halloween" movies to restore some much-needed class to the "slasher flick" genre, but the film's 85-minute running time leaves scores of irritating unanswered questions and unresolved issues.
Alright, no one buying a ticket for "H2O" is going in expecting an insightful study of human nature, but much of the movie's first hour devotes itself to detailing the disturbing, fragile bond between Curtis' character Laurie Strode and her 17-year-old son John (Josh Hartnett), which plays like an Oedipal version of the Meg Ryan-Andy Garcia relationship in "When A Man Loves A Woman." Still traumatized from her violent brushes with her psychotic brother Michael Myers, Laurie now lives under the alias of Keri Tate and oversees Hillcrest, an exclusive prep school. She's referred to by John as a "functioning alcoholic," which apparently means she can pound glasses of chardonnay at lunch, down a triple-vodka dinner and still have the energy to harangue Hillcrest's useless security guard (LL Cool J).
Director Steve Miner, whose previous films include the clever sleeper "Warlock," manages to sustain a fair level of tension as Laurie's drink-induced hallucinations of Michael -- he's become her personal Baby Cha Cha -- give way to the all-too-real thing, the chalky-faced killing machine who shows up at school while the kids are away on a Halloween field trip. While family counseling might have worked wonders for other siblings in similar situations, Laurie and Michael prefer to resolve their differences with big knives, heavy machinery and the always-reliable fireman's ax.
Curtis is both "H2O''s trump card and its biggest problem, the trouble being that she does such a fine job of illuminating Laurie's hollow shell of a life that we can't help but want to know more about her and how she's managed to keep it together for as long as she has. There's considerably more attention paid to characterization here than one would expect in a horror film and that may cause "H2O" to seem slightly sluggish to fans raised on the high energy and hip wit of the "Scream" movies.
Because Curtis takes so much care in establishing Laurie as a fascinating, flawed woman, the slash-and-burn mayhem of the film's last 20 minutes (complete with 'victims' coming back from death's door) seems like the writers' lazy way out of completing what could have been a much smarter, more interesting script. There are enough flashes of intelligence in "H2O" -- check out the music during Janet Leigh's big scene and the make of the automobile she's driving -- to indicate everyone concerned could have gone a bit further and pushed the boundaries of the genre a little more. Unfortunately, the abrupt ending of "H2O" cuts it to the quick, making the movie seem like a slow build-up to a puny pay-off. James Sanford
The review above was posted to the
rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the
review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright
belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due
to ASCII to HTML conversion.
Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews