Rounders has a good poker face, but a light two pair behind it.
A review of Rounders by James Brundage
Clichés. They exist in our everyday lives in the form of platitudes and in our everyday situations in the form of idiosyncratic events. In movies, clichés exist simply as cliches. The single word covers whatever we've seen before, or rather seen before so many times its trite. I guess my definition of cliché, however, is warped by how many movies I've seen.
To any normal viewer walking into Rounders, they'll come out with a smile on their face. They may come out knowing more about poker, too. They also will come out with a slightly funny look on their face because of the highly technical talk and barrage of New York City slang. A good example is the title, which, for all people who are probably wondering what on earth it means, a rounder is street slang for a card shark good enough to make it his or her living. But then comes the movie buff. The movie buff, he'll look at the film and he'll see right through it like an actual Rounder reading a player's hand without looking at it. He'll see what lurks behind the sharp, well-acting eyes of such stars as Matt Damon, (Good Will Hunting, Saving Private Ryan) Edward Nortan (The People vs. Larry Flynt), John Malkovich (In the Line of Fire) , who, don't get me wrong, did great jobs in their part. He'll hear the lines that seem so average. He'll spend his two odd hours enjoying the movie for the poker, but not for the film itself.
It's not that the film is bad. It's a two pair. But, problem is, it had to go down charted waters to go into the uncharted ones. It's enjoyable. It's fun. You may come out feeling like you won, you may come out feeling like you lost. I guess the point is this : seeing Rounders is like playing poker. If you only play part of the time, you'll have fun. If you're a pro, it's simply taking care of business.
The review above was posted to the
rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the
review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright
belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due
to ASCII to HTML conversion.
Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews