'Reds' (1981)
A retrospective movie review by Walter Frith
wfrith@cgocable.net
Member of the ‘Online Film Critics Society' http://ofcs.org/ofcs/
It would have been easy for Warren Beatty to make his masterpiece 'Reds' only about the Russian revolution of 1917. The film is also a torrid romance, a semi documentary feature in many ways, a panoramic and exquisitely filmed motion picture that in many ways is better than David Lean's great 'Doctor Zhivago' and, if you disagree with that, is certainly a great companion piece to that film. The thrust of Beatty's sensational and provocative film lies in the fact that Beatty not only tells a story about the revolution of communism in Russia, but tells it from the stand point of an American journalist, himself a communist, who was able to enrage and yet strongly soothe his colleagues with his ideas of how the world should be run. Beatty plays John Reed, an man whose literary work 'Ten Days That Shook the World', would be the inspiration for this film which includes Reed's passionate and stormy relationship with fellow journalist Louise Bryant (Diane Keaton), who gives the best performance in the film.
The film begins during World War I and has a very unusual narrative. Witnesses in the form of ordinary people are displayed on camera as being interviewed in documentary fashion and tell many aspects of the film's story through their own experiences and the film displays the pictures of it all. John Reed believes that America's involvement in the war is purely economical and is for nothing more than profit. His motives are found to be puzzling by many, including Louise Bryant, who wants to interview him. He explains that he doesn't do interviews (in many ways, a reflection of the real Warren Beatty) but he is strangely attracted to her and the two of them fall in love throughout the course of the film.
John Reed's crusade takes him to Europe to spread his propaganda and his words at home about the dismantling of all things capitalistic are seen as treasonous by the government. John has many friends, some of whom are eventually exposed as mere acquaintances. There is the great literary genius Eugene O'Neill (Jack Nicholson) who has an affair with Louise and mocks John's political beliefs. Louis Fraina (Paul Sorvino) who is one of Reed's somewhat confused political operatives. Grigory Zinoviev (Jerzy Kosinski), Reed's subversive revolutionary companion in Russia and his hard line colleague in communist propaganda back in America, Emma Goldman (Maureen Stapleton). There are many other character actors and great talents in the film such as Edward Herrmann, Josef Sommer, George Plimpton, M. Emmet Walsh and the superb Gene Hackman who, surprisingly, has a very small role in the picture as a right wing magazine editor.
Where the film is a little weak is in the way that it tells its love story between Reed and Bryant. The outline and execution of it is a little corny and detracts from the story of the revolution. It isn't bad beyond belief but it could have been trimmed a little bit. To compensate for it, the film tells of John Reed's battle with kidney infections and his eventual loss of one of them and a warning from his doctor that he must slow down if he wants to live a full and healthy life and the film's most impressive turning point is when Reed is doomed to come back to America after a warrant is issued for his arrest for wanting to overthrow the government and Louise Bryant follows him to Russia and searches for him vigourously.
'Reds' won three Oscars. For Best Director (Warren Beatty), Best Supporting Actress (Maureen Stapleton), and Best Cinematography (Vittorio Storaro). It had twelve nominations including Best Picture and Best Original Screenplay by Beatty and Trevor Griffiths and Robert Towne worked on the script in an uncredited manner as he does on many films.
I find it interesting that at the time of its release in 1981, 'Reds' was the heavy favourite for the Best Picture Oscar and lost to the very deserving 'Chariots of Fire'. With communism still a serious threat to the world in 1981, it would be inconceivable to imagine the Academy giving a Best Picture Oscar to the story of an American who believed in communism. Perhaps now that the iron curtain has fallen, the film would have won if it had come out today since communism looks less likely to impose any real threat to the planet. It may have been an untimely release but nevertheless is a pleasure to look back on as its subject matter is fascinating and relatively educational for many generations --- most importantly, those yet to come.
Visit FILM FOLLOW-UP by Walter Frith http://www.cgocable.net/~wfrith/movies.htm
* * * * * - a must see * * * * 1/2 - don't miss it * * * * - an excellent film * * * 1/2 - a marginal recommendation * * * - can't quite recommend it * * 1/2 - don't recommend it * * - avoid it * 1/2 - avoid it seriously * - avoid it AT ALL COSTS 1/2 - see it at your own risk zero - may be hazardous to your health
The review above was posted to the
rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the
review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright
belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due
to ASCII to HTML conversion.
Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews