KUNDUN (director: Martin Scorsese; cast: Tenzin Thuthob Tsarong, Gyurme Tethong, Tencho Gyalpo, Tsewang Migyur Khangsar, Geshi Yeshi Gyatso, 1997)
One may justifiably ask, as many critics did, what was Scorsese thinking when he made Kundun? Is he capable of making a film on a subject he has only a limited knowledge of?
The first question is a snap to answer, he was thinking about the 14th Dalai Lama and the suffering of his people. Thusly, he would make a political statement about the Tibetan situation and show the outrages their culture is going through in the hands of the conquering oppressors, the Chinese communists. The style of the film is semi - documentary, allowing nonprofessional actors to dominate the film (they did a great job).
The film begins with the joy and pride of the 14th Dalai Lama being chosen at the age of two in 1937 and ends on the sour note of his forced departure in 1959.
In between, the story is told from the Dalai Lama's point of view, as he grows up quickly, faced with worldly decisions for his people at the tender age of 14. His sense of reality is enhanced by his inner experiences in the form of dreams and meditation. His nonviolence is steadfast, despite reasons to feel anger at the Chinese for their killings and barbarous attitude and insulting comments about his country. What is most brilliant, is the camera work that focuses clearly on all the chaos and religious nuances, and records them in a way acting could not duplicate.
The shortcomings of this film may or may not be in the second question asked: Whether Scorsese is capable of gleaming the truths of Tibetan Buddhism, since any film about Tibet has to comprehend the influence religion plays on its people. I think Scorsese wants this film to be seen not necessarily as a religious experience, but as a spiritual calling that people of different faiths from all over the world can share in. This film is noncommercial, thereby it doesn't have to satisfy the wants of those who demand to see a film in a prescribed way. That this film is successful and worth seeing, becomes apparent, especially, when you compare it with the other recent film that tried to explore the Tibetan situation, SEVEN YEARS IN TIBET; and it should become obvious how Scorsese's film towers over that one in perspective and feeling. For Christ's sake, the other humanitarian film used a Nazi as the hero of the story, which made it very difficult to feel very trusting of the film's aims, especially since no one even mentioned a little thing like a holocaust taking place.
The weakness of Kundun is that since Scorsese wasn't confident or knowledgable enough about Tibet, he had to use the Dalai Lama as a source of reference for the film; and this shows, the film might be authentic in scope, but it lacks the artistic spark a great work of art must have, instead, this well - meaning presentation gets bogged down in its own propaganda and the movie gets blandly trapped in its own goody - two - shoe approach. Now, the exception to this, is that marvelously original Dalai Lama dream sequence, the one of impending doom for his country as he dreams of the monks in their red robes all lying dead in the field. We see a human being who is concerned that maybe he doesn't know everything.
I, for one, never fully trust those who are held up on a pedestal as incarnations of what is good. And films that lose their ability to penetrate all that makes things tick inside their characters, lose a certain amount of integrity.
Though, Scorsese's film is not a masterpiece, it certainly accomplished what he wanted it to do, and therefore with that limited objective in mind, I find it easy to recommend this film (even though I consider the HORSE THIEF to be the best film on Tibet to date, but I realize that the subject matter of this film is exceedingly important and should be seen by a wide range of people. After all, an entire culture is being wiped out in front of our eyes, and people must be made aware of it. The media has not done a good job in this regard, and maybe a film such as this can somehow compensate somewhat for that past neglect.
REVIEWED ON 8/5/98 GRADE: A-
http:www.sover.net/~ozus
Dennis Schwartz: Movie Reviews ozus @sover.net
© ALL RIGHTS RESERVED DENNIS SCHWARTZ
The review above was posted to the
rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the
review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright
belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due
to ASCII to HTML conversion.
Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews