Gods and Monsters (1998)

reviewed by
Ken Pierce


This review is supplied by the DVD Future website! www.dvdfuture.com

Gods and Monsters
Directed by Bill Condon
Starring Ian McKellan, Brendan Fraser, Lynn Redgrave

`To a New World of gods and monsters!' – from James Whale's classic film, Bride of Frankenstein.

Some films are just so amazing that they have to be seen more than once. Gods and Monsters is one of those films.

This film is about the last few weeks of director James Whale's life (Frankenstein, Bride of Frankenstein, Showboat). It delves very deeply into his personal life and his past, showing his day to day routine after a stroke has destroyed a portion of his brain and is causing him to hallucinate. Of course, it's the revelations that occur during this process which make the movie so good.

The story is fictional, but based on real-life accounts of Whale's life. As far as anyone knows, Brendan Fraser's character is fictional, though Lynn Redgrave's character, Hanna, is based on Whale's real-life maid and caretaker, and of course several supporting characters are based in reality.

The film starts out by showing Whale as a dirty old man, interested only in getting young guests out of their clothes and into his pool in a state of nakedness. It immediately becomes apparent that this is not going to be an ordinary Point A to B to Z story as most Hollywood movies are. In this case, this is a very good thing.

The story weaves its web around you, slowly introducing those characters who are important, and through a series of flashbacks, hallucinations and monologues explains Whale's childhood and young adult years. This all helps to bring McKellan's character even more to life, and to bring sympathy to an otherwise misogynistic man. All the meanwhile, subplots are evolving and coming to a head in a brilliant climax which will remain unrevealed here.

Ian McKellan, Lynn Redgrave and Brendan Fraser all give great performances here. McKellan and Redgrave both have received Oscar nods for their work in this film (we'll see if they win on Sunday…), and both deserve to take home the Golden Boy. Fraser's performance seems to have been underrated because he plays `the dumb guy'. I don't see it this way at all, since Fraser's character is completely believable. No, he's not an Oxford-educated snob, he's a regular joe, and he plays it that way. He also shows with a few simple gestures that there's a lot more going on under the surface. As the movie progresses, Fraser's character literally `bubbles' with interesting revelations, and this helps to keep the movie flowing. An absolutely stunning performance, and proof that there's more to this guy than Encino Man or George of the Jungle (though both are films which I enjoyed immensely, they hardly stretch his acting muscles). Unfortunately, Fraser still spends a lot of time in this movie with his clothes off…maybe in the Mummy he'll get to wear a shirt.

Needless to say, Bill Condon has impressed me with this film. I'm even more impressed when I consider that Condon's previous work is the little-seen horror flick sequel Candyman: Farewell to the Flesh. It's obvious that Condon sees a little bit of himself in James Whale, and allows that to reflect into his vision. The difference is, that whereas Whale is best remembered for his films which he didn't really care for, Condon will easily be remembered for brilliant works of art if this is to be his quality of film from now on. Of course, with him being such a close friend of Clive Barker, there is a very real possibility that he could end up back in the horror genre before long. With the right script, though, this could be a great thing for horror.

Until next time, go see a movie!
Ken Pierce
Contributing Editor, www.dvdfuture.com

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own


The review above was posted to the rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due to ASCII to HTML conversion.

Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews