Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace (1999)

reviewed by
Eric Robinette


Review by Eric Robinette
SirCritic@aol.com

Turmoil has engulfed the movie-going public. The worth of "Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace" is in dispute.

Hoping to resolve the matter with a sensible, clear-eyed review, the errant knight, Sir Phil M. Critic, endeavored to offer his own opinion, even if he was a little late with it, to help settle the conflict.

As far as Sir Critic could see, it was like a period of civil war amongst the moviegoers. A handful blindly loved the movie, having been starved of a "Star Wars" film for 16 years. Another surly and disgruntled group tried to score a victory against what they called "The evil Lucasfilm empire" by leveling accusations of racism at the film. A third large and unruly group complained that the movie was all flash and fire, with no true sense of heart or emotion

Sir Critic immediately dismissed the racism claims of the surly group, believing its arguments had enough foolishness to embarrass an entire profession. Alarmed by the group's cynical tone, the knight branded them as the sort of charlatans who like to spend time looking for messages that simply did not exist, with their real purpose being to draw attention to themselves.

"What utter nonsense!" the knight declared. The Trade Federation aliens speak in a Japanese accent, I believe, because this is homage to the Japanese films of Akira Kurosawa, who inspired the "Star Wars" series in the first place. As for the sidekick Jar Jar Binks' Jamaican overtones, that is because this is the accent that the voice actor, Ahmed Best, actually uses."

Evading the dreaded racist claims, Sir Critic tried to begin his proper review. However, the other critics, obsessed with shooting the film down, dispatched hundreds of angry barbs at the film, in particular assailing the sidekick character of Jar-Jar, whom they labeled as a constant nuisance.

Sir Critic conceded that Jar-Jar's pidgin English, which sounded like a warped form of Pig Latin, was off-putting and unnecessary, but aside from that, he found the character amusing in the role of a clumsy oaf, which gave the film many lighthearted moments of humor.

The unruly group then changed tactics, focusing on a new, pointed attack even more powerful than their first. They argued the film was nothing more than an overstuffed visual feast, with plenty to look at, but little to care about and no depth of character or storytelling to be found.

Sir Critic had to concede this argument, but only up to a point. He agreed that the movie was basically two-hours plus of setup for the darker chapters in the saga that were to follow, and this particular episode had little in the way of emotional heft.

Even so, Sir Critic predicted that when the entire series was completed, "The Phantom Menace" would fit in nicely with the entire series. He found it especially interesting that Obi-Wan Kenobi trained Anakin when he was an inexperienced Jedi, which makes for some ominous foreshadowing.

"But do not forget the most important point," Sir Critic advised the others. "When all is said and done, the most important question is 'Was the film an entertaining, exciting time at the theater?' My answer is yes, very much so. 'The Phantom Menace,' is, like the other films, an adventure story at heart. As an adventure, it succeeds grandly with great set pieces like the pod race and the final battle with Darth Maul, which are worth the price of admission by themselves.

"Could it have been better? Yes, it could have, but no movie could possibly live up to the expectations that had built up behind it. 'The Phantom Menace' may not be the best of the series, but it has one thing in common with the other films: it is a lot of fun."


The review above was posted to the rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due to ASCII to HTML conversion.

Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews