Blair Witch Project, The (1999)

reviewed by
Chuck Schwartz


www.CrankyCritic.com Syndicated in South America and Japan by Entertainment Drive (In rotation) Fax Message:

 To: Jeremy Walker
 Company: Clein + Walker
 Phone: 247-4100
 Fax: 247-4562
 Author: Chuck Schwartz
 Company: CrankyCritic.com
 Phone: 212 371-0130
 Fax: 212 527-2539
 Number of Pages: 3
 Date: July 31, 1999

CrankyCritic® on the web: www.crankycritic.com; www.filmfrenzy.com; www.ofcs.org; www.edrive.com CrankyCritic® syndicated to South America and Japan by Entertainment Drive CrankyCritic® on TV: in rotation on CNN Saturday Morning CrankyCritic® on radio: Fridays on techedgeradio.com. Commercial syndication is in negotiation. Really.

Chuck Schwartz/ CrankyCritic.com 223 East 61st Street Apt 5B New York, NY 10021 Cranky Critic® movie reviews: The Blair Witch Project not rated, 87 minutes Starring Heather Donahue, Michael Williams, and Joshua Leonard Written and Directed by Daniel Myrick and Eduardo Sanchez website: www.blairwitch.com

IN SHORT: The buzz was better than the movie.

Cranky has written before of how those of us who make our living reviewing movies are a small, compact community, who share the buzz on "small" or independent flicks that may otherwise be overlooked. Over the last six months there's been major buzz about a no-name flick -- that means no star actors or production folk. It's no reflection on talent -- called The Blair Witch Project. Word was this documentary style horror flick was tremendous, which explains the packed house in the screening room when we got our first look at the flick this past June.

The story concept was great: Three budding filmmakers, Heather Donahue (director), Michael Williams (sound), and Joshua Leonard (camera) are shooting a documentary on an 18th century "witch" named Elly Dedward when they vanish forever into a Maryland woods. A year later, their film and tape is found and is edited into a coherent form by the team of Daniel Myrick and Eduardo Sanchez, revealing the physically deterioration and psychological self-destruction of eight lost days during which the group finds themselves hunted by an unknown entity.

The only problem is, the history of the "Blair Witch" isn't well documented in the film. The "filmmakers" spend more time focussing on a 1940s child killer who stalked the town and don't make a strong link between that "possession" and others that have occurred over the past two centuries (I'll get back to that). Residents of the town of Burkittsville (formerly Blair) are interviewed about what they know of the witch or the killer in the first half of the film that is very entertaining. Once they get lost in the woods, and I'll not give most of that away, the film begins to feel like something that was made up on the spot.

Which it was. Myrick and Sanchez gave the three actors film and video equipment to shoot with and story notes from which they were then left to improvise. The net result are scenes that sometimes look totally natural, and sometimes look like a bunch of scenery chewing. "Mike" goes through mood swings that a) make you wish he had brought a Valium drip with him and b) detract from the better than usual improv job done by "Heather" and "Josh". That pair are more consistent in their characterizations but the overall picture just isn't scary.

No one ever implied that BWP was a slice 'n' dice flick. If that's what you expect in your scareflicks, you won't like this.

This is one of the few times that the website is a vital resource, and more entertaining, than the film. There's a tremendous amount of material documenting the "witch" or the alleged possessions (there are more than one). Having the background details down cold will help fill in the gaps for you and may raise the tension levels high enough that you get a fright or two. Cranky got the material just before his screening, and knowing the details only pointed out the failure of the improvisations.

On average, a first run movie ticket will run you Eight Bucks. Were Cranky able to set his own price to The Blair Witch Project, he would have paid...

$1.00

and, as we used to say in school, an "A" for effort. The sum of the parts do not make for an enthralling whole.

Cranky Critic® is a Registered Trademark of, and Copyright © by, Chuck Schwartz. All Rights Reserved.


The review above was posted to the rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due to ASCII to HTML conversion.

Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews