STIR OF ECHOES (director/writer: David Koepp; screenwriter: based on the 1958 novel by Richard Matheson; cinematographer: Fred Murphy; cast: Zachary David Cope (Jake), Kevin Bacon (Tom), Kathryn Erbe (Maggie), Illeana Douglas (Lisa), Kevin Dunn (Frank), Conor O'Farrell (Harry), Liza Weil (Debbie), Eddie Bo Smith Jr. (Neil, Chicago cop), Jenny Morrison (Samantha), 1999)
Reviewed by Dennis Schwartz
Stir of Echoes is firstly a ghost story and then it's a murder story, taking place in a working class Chicago neighborhood, where the neighbors party together and seem to be close-knit and concerned about one another. In either case, writer/director David Koepp (writer of Snake Eyes, The Lost World and director of The Trigger Effect) has come up with an emotionally disturbing film.
Tom Witzky (Kevin Bacon) is a telephone lineman and as a hobby plays guitar for a rock band. He is down on himself for his life being so ordinary, yet he tells his expectant wife Maggie (Kathryn Erbe) that he is a happy man because he has her. One of their problems, is that their 5- year- old son Jake (Zachary David Cope) sees ghosts and carries out conversations with them in a most peculiar fashion. He asks a ghost,"Does it hurt to be dead?" If I were his dad I would have gotten the kid some professional help before I attended another neighborhood get together.
But this ghost story is about the ordeal of the most unlikely believer in such supernatural tales, the hard-hat father of Jake, the one who has always repressed his extra-ordinary visionary gift. Therefore the film chooses not to focus too much on the precocious kid's gift, going almost exclusively for his father's nightmarish visions to tell its tale.
Tom's common man persona will quickly change during one of those gatherings, when his sister-in-law Lisa (Illeana Douglas), her sardonic humor much appreciated by me, talks about hypnosis and the drunken and skeptical Tom challenges the very amateur hypnotist to put him under. As a result, the lesson being becomes: never play mind games you don't understand with someone inexperienced and not completely reliable who has you under their power. As it turns out, our man is a Receiver (which in the supernatural trade, means that he has the gift, he could see things in the other world). Tom is told to think of an empty theater, with that in mind visions come to him very violently of some ill-doings in the house he is renting, giving him the impression someone's buried there. When out of the trance, he says he felt no pain and is surprised when told he had a pin stuck in him. He remembers nothing of his visions but still has x-ray vision and severe headaches and a foreboding fear that he better do something about these visions or else his family will be in danger. The next day when he turns to ask the kooky Lisa what she did to him, she tells him she only suggested to him that he keep the door open, to have an open mind.
He starts calling in sick to work, and his worried wife thinks he's cracking-up. And even after he tells her what's going on inside his head, she doesn't get it that this could be something requiring professional help; she seems to be more concerned that he's used up all his sick days. But the kid understands his father, they are now both on the same wavelength and hold frequent chats together in private, afraid that what they are talking about would scare mommy.
Tom is now obsessed with the vision of a ghost in the house, which he soon identifies as a missing neighborhood teenager, Samantha Kozac (Jenny). She is mentally retarded and the sister of Debbie (Liza Weil), who babysits for Jake for only the first time at the suggestion of Jake. Debbie's presence gets the ghost story really rolling, as Jake blurts out to her his visions of Samantha being in the house. Though, at times, the story is close to losing it, getting enveloped in melodramatics, it manages to pull back and return to the family and their struggle with the existence of a ghost in their house and their marital problems, keeping the film suspenseful, allowing you to overlook if you care to, the many holes in the story. It isn't until the climax that the film really falls apart and reverts to a conventional ending, as it tries to do justice to the murdered ghost. The film just lost control of what it had going for it that made it different from, let's say, another recent ghost film, The Sixth Sense, and plummeted it back into the world of the run-of-the mill films of that genre.
When both father and son share ghostly visions of Samantha and the film moves into the afterworld to tell its chilling story, the tale is compelling. It is illustriously shot and its ghostly visions are stunningly creepy. It also captures in its sights the good, bad, and ugly of Chicago. This fast moving film has hooked onto the nuances of its working class neighborhood completely, and by being grounded with this kind of reality the ghost story becomes more effective.
>From this character driven film, we learn that ghosts get angry when we don't respond to them properly. That the afterworld is a place that some of us more than others have a chance to penetrate and if we do, we better learn how to listen. Kevin Bacon plays the role convincingly, with just the right amount of skepticism and psychological tension, coming close but never going over the top, like a lesser actor might have been tempted to do. Kathryn Erbe is solid in her role as the loving wife who doesn't see what the rest of her family sees supernaturally but in her own brave way tries to manage to keep the family together. Zachary David Cope seems like a child who is used to seeing strange things all his life and is rather placid and accepting about it, playing his role as well as could be expected. But I did have some problems that what was happening to him was not more fully developed. I felt I didn't really know much more about him by the film's end than from its beginning. In both sequences ghosts are communicating with him. I just had the feeling that the kid could end up being a basket case if his folks didn't take some time to help him deal with his gift, and that even though they were hard working and nice people, they were not a very perceptive couple.
What transpires is an ok ghost story, a suspenseful story of an ordinary couple trying to cope with something that they are not prepared for, and a weak murder story, that ruins the film, as it brings it down to earth in a most desultory manner.
Is the film worth seeing? Yes. It is entertaining and spooky, and you get taken on an emotional roller coaster ride. No. It is earthbound and contrived, and the ending is a stinker. Take your pick, both answers are correct.
REVIEWED ON 9/21/99 GRADE: C
Dennis Schwartz: "Ozus' World Movie Reviews"
http://www.sover.net/~ozus
ozus@sover.net
© ALL RIGHTS RESERVED DENNIS SCHWARTZ
The review above was posted to the
rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the
review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright
belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due
to ASCII to HTML conversion.
Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews