Fly, The (1986)

reviewed by
Mike Merrin


If "The Dead Zone" opened up a new area of concern for Cronenberg, then "The Fly" confirmed, not that it should have needed confirming, that he is much more than just a gore merchant. The love story that is on the margins of "Dead Zone" is placed centre stage in "The Fly", which is surely one of the most moving love stories ever made. It is the ultimate riposte to the banalities of Hollywood romantic trash, notably "Love Story" in which, you will remember, the heroine dies of an incurable disease, but does it very prettily and quietly.

The plot of the film is incredibly simple - Seth Brundle, a scientist, invents a new process to transport matter from one place to another in a matter of seconds. After a row with his girlfriend, he decides to try the process for himself, and is successful, with one big reservation. A fly has penetrated the teleport, and the scientist has now become "Brundlefly" as the computer so matter-of-factly puts it. He gradually disintegrates, becoming first a man-fly hybrid and, ultimately, more fly than man. HIs girlfriend is initially fascinated, not least by his new status as a sexual athlete, but subsequently becomes disgusted, and finally pitying. Brundle, on the other hand, retains his love for the woman who is rejecting him, and relies on her to deliver the coup-de-grace at the end, when the transformation is complete.

"The Fly" has been called a metaphor for AIDS, something which Cronenberg has always been very keen to reject. In truth, there is nothing very AIDS-like about Brundle's problem. What the film is undeniably about, however, is the experience of changing from one's normal state into something different - be it from cancer or simply from ageing. The patient seems to accomodate themselves fairly quickly to their new state - Brundle even keeps a video record of his disintegration, and catalogues the bits that fall off him, keeping them in the bathroom cabinet. The problem comes for the people around him who cannot accept the change, and want him back the way he was. What the film conveys very well is the idea of having someone you love change beyond all recognition.

Geena Davis is very good at disgust, and very sharp and funny in the early sections. She even pulls off the difficult final scene, when she has to put Brundlefly out of his misery. The problem is in the structure of the film; she does not seem committed enough to Brundle and their relationship has not been going for long enough before the changes begin. The film would have been more effective if they had been having a relationship for a more considerable period of time. Incidentally, the same problem occurs yet again in "Dead Ringers", but that's another story.

The strength of "The Fly", however, lies in its essential honesty. Disease, particularly a fatal disease, is horrible, it's messy and unpleasant. The film doesn't duck the nastier side of the transformation; the new method of eating is a show-stopping sequence, especially when it is later applied to a cartoon baddie, played by John Getz. What helps a lot is Jeff Goldblum's incredible performance. He gets over two important things; the self disgust at the change, and the scientist's fascination at what is, after all, a unique situation. He's also capable of unexpected anger, when he tells his Davis to leave before he hurts her. It's a great performance, one of the best in any of Cronenberg's films.

The effects, design and make-up are beyond criticism - the acid test for this is the final scene in the film. Brundlefly, having turned malevolent, wants to combine himself with Davis to create an eternal union. Saved at the last moment, Davis escapes and Brundlefly only combines himself with the teleporter. Dragging himself out of the machine at the end, the creature picks up the end of a shotgun and points it at his head. It sounds stupid, but on film it is incredibly powerful. The look that the creature gives Davis at the end is heartbreaking, which is perhaps the highest compliment I can pay the effects team. It's in the great tradition of the tragic monster, which goes right back to "King Kong".

Interesting that, in several of Cronenberg's films, the hero goes to his death willingly at the end - even if it isn't suicide, it's a blissful escape from a life which has become intolerable. Cronenberg seems to genuinely believe in the idea of the final redemption through sacrifice; part of his romantic spirit, I suppose. It's a device which works well in his films, largely because he plays it straight. There is no camp in these films - camp being one of the major problems in "eXistenZ". The emotions are for real, and the most important emotion in "The Fly" and, even more so, in "Dead Ringers", is love. At the end of "Dead Ringers", we can only really feel despair, but there is a sort of hope at the end of both "The Fly" and "The Dead Zone". In both, the hero dies, but there is also a final reconciliation with the loved one that suggests, at least, some sort of closure.

Is "The Fly" an anti-science film ? I only raise the question because I've read critics who argue that it is, but I'm not so sure. The problems are caused by user-error, not by the computer, which only does as it is supposed to. I'm not sure that science really comes into it in "The Fly", because it has the structure of a classical tragedy - the hero is brought down by one small mistake which then snowballs into his destruction. Science is the enabler of the tragedy, but not the sole cause of it.

"The Fly" was a huge hit with audiences, many of whom seem to have misinterpreted it as a gore-fest. It's not that simple; yes, it's gory, but the gore is completely central to the story, rather as it is in Carpenter's "The Thing", a film with which this shares little, except an awareness of the vulnerability of the human body. In an interview, Cronenberg said something very penetrating about this central theme, one which recurs in many of his films. He talked about the AIDS epidemic, and asked the interviewer to try to see it from the point of view of the virus. For human beings, it's a crisis, but for the virus, which is, after all, a living creature, it's like Christmas and birthdays all rolled into one. It seems to me that this is very illuminating, both as an observation, and also as a footnote to Cronenberg's attitude to horror.

Ultimately though, what makes "The Fly" special is that it has genuine concern for the problems of the human heart, and acknowledges that while love may not conquer all, it can at least make an imprint upon those it touches that they can never forget. Having said that, it also accepts that in real life, love doesn't always work out, and that, for some, this failure can be more than they can bear. Indeed, the theme of the failure of love to work out is central to his next, and best, film "Dead Ringers".

Mike

"Tchaikovsky - was he the tortured soul who poured out his immortal longings into dignified passages of stately music, or was he just an old pouf who wrote tunes ?"

Python: 1969 - 1999

The review above was posted to the rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due to ASCII to HTML conversion.

Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews