PHILADELPHIA
A film review by James Berardinelli
Copyright 1994 James Berardinelli
Rating (Linear 0 to 10): 8.4
Date Released: 12/22/93 (NY, LA); 1/14/94 (elsewhere) Running Length: 2:05 Rated: PG-13 (Mature themes, language, brief nudity)
Starring: Tom Hanks, Denzel Washington, Jason Robards, Mary Steenburgen, Antonio Banderas, Lisa Summerour, Joanne Woodward Director: Jonathan Demme Producers: Edward Saxon and Jonathan Demme Screenplay: Ron Nyswaner Music: Howard Shore Released by TriStar Pictures
Some will argue that a film, being essentially a means of entertainment, can do little to change a national consciousness. Others, citing the power of the medium, will claim that motion pictures possess this rare and extraordinary ability. These two opposing viewpoints are about to be put to the test with two films that, while different in so many ways, have a number of fundamental similarities. The first is Steven Spielberg's SCHINDLER'S LIST. The second is Jonathan Demme's PHILADELPHIA. For viewers of the latter movie, the question is not whether they sympathize with Tom Hanks' AIDS-afflicted, gay character, but whether that sympathy opens up a different perspective on the victims of the disease in the real world.
Andrew Beckett (Tom Hanks), a hotshot law graduate from Penn, has a promising career ahead of him when he discovers that he has AIDS. Choosing not to tell his mentor at the firm, Charles Wheeler (Jason Robards) of either his disease or his sexual orientation, Andrew moves forward with his case load as a senior associate, intending to fulfill his duties for as long as his handicap permits. But the partners learn of his affliction, and while their dismissal is couched in terms of incompetence, Andrew knows that his AIDS and homosexuality are the root cause. He takes his case to a number of lawyers, including ambulance- chaser Joe Miller (Denzel Washington), none of whom is willing to represent him--until Miller has a change of heart, recognizing a hint of familiar discrimination in the way Andrew is being treated.
The point has been made numerous times that this is the first "big name, big budget" AIDS motion picture to come out of Hollywood, so I won't belabor the point. It's a good start, and some might argue "too little, too late," but for there to be any hope of this industry having an impact, more films of this caliber must be released. PHILADELPHIA is unlikely to succeed as a lone cry in the wilderness, however impressive it may be.
Tom Hanks gives what has rightly been called "the performance of his career," lending humanity and vibrancy to the victim, and portraying him in a manner that eschews maudlin, obvious tactics to garner the audience's sympathy. We feel for Andrew Beckett because he seems to be a genuine human being, not because the script and production have twisted circumstances to manipulate our emotions.
With all of the plaudits garnered by Hanks, the work of Denzel Washington, while less obvious, is as impressive. Washington plays the "everyman," the on-screen representation of those in the audience who harbor homophobic tendencies. He, like many viewers, is forced to examine his bigotry, and reassess his feelings about the gay community, as he comes to know them as people rather than symbols and caricatures. Its also ironic that most of PHILADELPHIA's humor comes through Washington, the recognized dramatic actor (as he passes out business cards), rather than through Hanks, known better for comic roles.
Curiously, Jason Robards has one of the worst-acted and the best-acted scenes in the film. Near the beginning, after being served a summons demanding his appearance in court, his character rants that Beckett is the criminal, having "brought AIDS into our offices." The entire speech rings false, like something out of an anti-homosexual pamphlet. On the other hand, Robards redeems himself later in the film when Beckett takes the witness stand--he speaks no words, but his expression is descriptive enough. Suddenly, winning or losing doesn't seem as important.
As far as the other supporting performers are concerned, Mary Steenburgen is a relative non-entity as the prosecuting attorney, Joanne Woodward is adequate as Beckett's supportive mother (it's nice to finally see a family that stands behind someone with AIDS, as opposed to the usual histrionics), and Antonio Banderas is marginal as Miguel, Beckett's companion (there's never any chemistry between the two supposed lovers).
If there's a scene that will earn Tom Hanks the Academy Award, it's where his character gives an impassioned translation of the aria "La Momma Morta" while his lawyer looks on in stunned silence. Here Andrew expresses his acceptance of death even as he acknowledges his continuing passion for life, and Miller feels fear as he recognizes that his client no longer disgusts him. This scene is PHILADELPHIA's watershed.
The sequences that work best are usually those that happen away from the court: Miller meeting a gay Penn student in a grocery store, Miller at a bar watching himself on TV, Beckett refusing an AZT treatment, and the aforementioned Maria Callas aria. Unfortunately, there are too few of these moments, with an inordinate amount of time spent in front of the judge. PHILADELPHIA doesn't work well as a courtroom drama--some of the scenes are necessary to underline certain points, but they go on too long. More character development, especially involving the complex relationship between Beckett and Miller, would have elevated the picture's power.
Symbolism is crucial to the story; the most obvious example is the role of physical space between Beckett and Miller. Before the AIDS revelation, they are shoulder-to-shoulder, two lawyers on opposite sides. Then Beckett drops his bombshell, and Miller moves to the other side of the room. As the film progresses, they grow gradually closer, sitting across a table at a library, then side-by-side in court. Finally, past the moment of Miller's crisis of conscience, he drops all barriers by lifting an oxygen mask to Andrew's face, momentarily touching flesh to flesh.
PHILADELPHIA was originally the movie's working name, but Demme stated that once he saw the preliminary cut, he couldn't think of a better final title. The film actually has three stars--in addition to Hanks and Washington, the city itself is shown in a favorable light. The opening montage to the tune of Bruce Springsteen's "The Streets of Philadelphia" is evocative.
Even as it stands, with its faults, PHILADELPHIA is still a remarkable expression of honesty and openness. Miller's court statements about this country's fear of homosexuals are frank and to-the-point, and there are other observations with equal merit. The story is timely and powerful, and the performances of Hanks and Washington assure that the characters will not immediately vanish into obscurity. And as long as people remember, there's a chance they can change.
- James Berardinelli (blake7@cc.bellcore.com)
.
The review above was posted to the
rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the
review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright
belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due
to ASCII to HTML conversion.
Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews