Intersection (1994)

reviewed by
Tak


                               INTERSECTION
                       A film review by Mark Takacs
                        Copyright 1994 Mark Takacs
Paramount Films  / rated R
Starring:   Richard Gere            Sharon Stone    Jennifer Morrison
                Lolita Davidovich            Martin Landau                        
Tak Classification: Romance Drama 
Tak Rating:  avoid it at all costs

One-Line-Summary ---------------- A man, his wife, his daughter, his lover, his memories and his problems.

Tak Plot Summary ---------------- Vincent Eastman (Richard Gere) is a successful architect with Sally (Sharon Stone), his wife and business partner of sixteen years, and a lovely daughter (Jennifer Morrison). His newfound love, Olivia Marshak (Lolita Davidovich), fills a void in Vince's life and is more than he can resist. He suffers lots of angst as tries to choose between his family history, or his happiness with Olivia.

Tak Thoughts ------------ Lame Lame Lame. There doesn't seem to be a point to INTERSECTION, other than to study Gere's character. At one point Vince yells at Olivia, "It's not about you, it's about me!" How true. The whole movie is set up so we can identify with his problems, his emotions, his turmoil, his everything. One problem. I didn't. Vince is a dweeb. I wished he would get it together and stop being indecisive.

The movie takes place over the span of about a week, with *frequent* flashbacks where Vince remembers and daydreams. We see his happy memories with Sally, his growing dissatisfaction, his meeting with Olivia, his break with Sally, and his time as ex-husband and single father. Of course Vince thinks highly of himself.

INTERSECTION's one action scene is the car crash featured in all the commercials. Because of this, I initially thought the movie might be something like REGARDING HENRY, with a tragic accident and the aftermath. Nope. Instead, we suffer through lots of Vince's problems first. And when the crash finally happens, the filmmakers get pretty excited about it. So excited that it is heavily foreshadowed and even shown twice. First we get the two-minute slo-mo version where everyone makes their favorite anguished Sly Stallone faces, and then after the comment--"I didn't have time to react, it all happened so fast..."--we get to see exactly how fast two seconds is.

Sharon Stone once again successfully avoids being sexy. Unlike in the stinker SLIVER, I think this time it was intentional. At one point Vince remembers (and we see) a "quickie" at a family gathering that is actually humorously sad. Poor Vince, no wonder he left.

I wouldn't have noticed this a year ago, but this movie is just monstrously *male*. Everything supports Vincent. Olivia's stated goal--"I just want to make your father happy". The glimpses of Megan shows she still loves Dad and wants to be with her father, even inviting him "out to the island" for Easter with Mom. Sally even tries to seduce her ex-husband--"what's a girl need to do to get some action around here", but stops herself, saying "oh, where did that come from?"

The ending was out of place ... after everything that happens, we are left with the distinct impression that everyone, wife AND lover, still loves Vince, that romantic rascal. Bah. I don't believe it. The heroic strength of "character" at the end is kind of insulting.

Tak Rating system: ------------------ I didn't like this film. I won't recommend this film. I won't even watch this film again. There wasn't enough going on to keep my interest, either emotionally or intellectually. Maybe some of you will like INTERSECTION, but I doubt it.

  X avoid at all costs
    watch it on cable
    wait for videotape
    see once as a matinee 
    see several times (w/friends) as matinee
    see once at full price
    see it several times - full and/or matinee
    see many times at full price
.

The review above was posted to the rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due to ASCII to HTML conversion.

Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews