filmcritic.com presents a review from staff member David Bezanson. You can find the review with full credits at http://www.filmcritic.com/misc/emporium.nsf/60e74e041ca9cd6b8625626f0062219f/a92fbd19d4c5c874882568d3000492c2?OpenDocument
The House on Haunted Hill
A film review by David Bezanson - Copyright (c) 2000 filmcritic.com
Director: William Malone Producers: Gilbert Adler, Joel Silver, Robert Zemeckis Screenwriter: Dick Beebe Stars: Geoffrey Rush, Taye Diggs, Famke Janssen, Ali Larter, Chris Kattan MPAA Rating: R Year of Release: 1999
Every so often, most recently with Scream, a film will briefly try to make the horror genre something it's not --- like creative, entertaining, cool, or self-aware. But The House on Haunted Hill is not one of those films.
Instead, it's pretty much a copy of all the other haunted-house horror movies that have run briefly in theaters over the years (and then run on cable channels indefinitely, giving teenagers something to stare at for a minute or two before leaving the house or switching channels). I understand that the beast of cable programming must be fed, but I still don't understand why directors are still making new movies like this, given the thousands that have already been made. Why don't the cable channels just run old ones from the late 1980s that nobody remembers?
Five people are invited to a party at a deserted former institution for the criminally insane. They've been promised a million dollars --- if they get out alive. I could summarize some of the other clichés in Haunted Hill, but anybody who's had cable for a while can probably do it for themselves.
There's nothing new or innovative about this movie except maybe for the baffling presence of a few name actors. Almost every actor or actress is haunted by a few B movies, and hopefully the careers of Diggs, Larter, and Kattan will get out alive. But nothing can explain or excuse the participation of Geoffrey Rush, who actually has won an Oscar, for God's sake. Faced with the pressure of following up his work in Shine and Shakespeare in Love, Rush choked, I guess.
I guess these movies are fun to make, but they're not interesting to watch. Please, no more!
* [LOWEST RATING]
-- Christopher Null - cnull@mindspring.com - http://www.filmcritic.com
The review above was posted to the
rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the
review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright
belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due
to ASCII to HTML conversion.
Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews