Four Weddings and a Funeral (1994)

reviewed by
Mark R. Leeper


                        FOUR WEDDINGS AND A FUNERAL
                      A film review by Mark R. Leeper
                       Copyright 1994 Mark R. Leeper
          Capsule review:  FOUR        WEDDINGS AND A FUNERAL has humor,
     good dialogue, people the audience        cares about, all to tell a
     story with        just a wisp of a plot.        With a genuine plot this
     could have        been a film really worth seeing.  Rating: +1 (-4
     to        +4)
     There is a        lot of truth in        advertising in the title of the        British
comedy FOUR WEDDINGS AND A FUNERAL.  This is a film that is about 80%
happiness and 20% pain.         Hugh Grant plays Charles, a bachelor who tells
himself        that he        is looking for a wife but is too indecisive and        unwilling to
commit to any one woman.  So he        goes to        wedding        after wedding getting
increasingly desperate and frustrated.        One after another marriage picks off
members        of Charles's group of close-knit friends.  The group is        centered
around the flamboyant Garath, played superbly by Simon Callow.        Both the
character and the actor        are incorrigible scene stealers, upstaging everybody
else in        sight.        Charles        has flitted from woman to woman        without        ever
deciding on one.  The only woman really        close to him is        Scarlett who is
either a sister        or a fraternal friend and housemate.  However Charles's
latest interest        is in a        visiting American, Carrie (Andie MacDowell) who
seems to be going to the same weddings.         Charles finds Carrie very
attractive--and        is often tongue-tied in        her presence--and almost would be
willing        to commit to her.  The two exchange intimacies of various kinds        but
neither        can really decide to marry the other.
     This film is a portrait of        Charles        and as with many painted portraits,
most of        the interest is        in the background.  Charles's friends may well have
more interesting stories to tell than Charles does.  The film lets you do
some jigsaw puzzle work        to piece together the stories of some of the
friends.  The script was written by Richard Curtis, one        of the founding
forces of British TV's "Black Adder" series.  Here his writing combines        the
slapstick of that show's style with more subtle        personal drama.         Everybody's
worst nightmares about just what could go wrong        at a wedding combine with
visual gags, dialogue gags, and        even subtitle gags.  Hugh Grant        is boyish
and pleasant enough but        not always believable as Charles.  He is the current
holder of the Anthony Hopkins Ubiquity Award for simultaneously        being in
this film, in SIRENS, and in Roman Polanski's BITTER MOON.  (Of        course some
of us will remember him        best as        a gay Cantabrigian in MAURICE or a kilted
Scot in        LAIR OF        THE WHITE WORM.)  Ironically, Andie MacDowell is central to
the story without having much of a role        except to look attractive.
Scarlett, the sister or        whatever, is actually a        more intriguing        role than is
Carrie.         But the plum role, of course, is Garath, whose        boisterous love        of
life makes him the focal point of so much of the film.
     This is a decidedly lightweight film but well made        and one        that has
occasionally very funny        gags.        I would        give it        a +1 on        the -4 to +4 scale.
                                        Mark R. Leeper
                                        att!mtgzfs3!leeper
                                        leeper@mtgzfs3.att.com
.

The review above was posted to the rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due to ASCII to HTML conversion.

Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews