Grass
rated R 80 minutes Unapix Films a documentary narrated by Woody Harrelson written by Solomon Vesta directed by Ron Mann
A Review by Frankie Paiva
This one-sided documentary is about marijuana's introduction and use in the United States in the 1990s. Brought over the border by Mexicans in the early part of the century, it was a joy for many. You could smoke it and escape your life, troubles, and problems. The stuff soon became so common you could find it on the side of the road. The government used marijuana as an excuse not to like Mexico. The Bureau of Narcotics formed shortly after some marijuana users turned violent. The head of the bureau launched several campaigns hoping to make marijuana as frowned upon as possible. More laws, restrictions, and programs popped up as time went on. Parents and worried officials wanted this stuff controlled. Several people thought it unfair that the government was creating laws that put innocent civilians who were just trying to relax in jail. Why should something enjoyable for most be illegal in the eyes of the law? The previous inquiry morphs into different forms as time and the film go on.
If I lived in the world that Grass presents, I would be an advocate to legalize marijuana too. This is certainly a bias documentary. The movie covers about eighty years of the drug, but skips over the 1980s and 1990s in approximately five minutes. It seems Grass covers only the periods where people lived in ignorance about the downsides from using the drug. There was always plenty of speculation from non-users about what would happen if a person took marijuana in the early days. A few of their fears were dispelled (or confirmed) after the first solid scientific research study on marijuana in the 1970s. Some of the best moments of the film are the official truths of the time. The truth, as issued by the government and accepted by non-users, flashes before each decade. Through the years, the government stopped saying marijuana would lead you to kill people, and started linking it as a stepping-stone to heroin abuse.
If anything, Grass is certainly a lot of fun. Clips from movies like Reefer Madness really heighten the experience. Cheech & Chong show up, as does Cab Calloway and Sonny Bono. Even Elvis Presley’s public service announcement discouraging drug use is included. There are some fantastic graphics and computer animated sequences that really help the movie. Whenever a law passes that is against marijuana, a disaster diagram (erupting volcanoes, spinning tornadoes, etc.) comes onscreen along with the name of the bill and the word, "PASSED." These types of pictures are always colorful and humorous. They capture the screw the government attitude adapted by most of the film.
Grass is essentially a piece of harmless propaganda. Hidden messages about legalizing marijuana lie under its surface. Most adults will not be susceptible to these, but it may influence some teens. It figures that Woody Harrelson narrates this film when one considers his work in attempting to legalize the Indian weed. Hypocrisy is present on both sides of the argument. One government official goes on about how bad drug addiction is while he continuously smokes a cigarette. Director Ron Mann never chooses to look at the devastating effects of the narcotic. Even so, the material presented is very interesting, and was certainly something I would not have pursued otherwise, and like some of the best documentaries, there are plenty of opportunities to laugh.
Unless you can personally relate to Grass's subject, it is likely to have little impact. This picture certainly does not break any new ground, and rarely rises above the amusing level. If it were more thought provoking than rebellious, it would be much better. This easily forgettable movie entertains while its playing, but never reaches a high. It leaves little to take with you or remember.
B-
Frankie Paiva SwpStke@aol.com http://www.homestead.com/cinemaparadise/mainpage.html
The review above was posted to the
rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the
review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright
belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due
to ASCII to HTML conversion.
Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews