NUTTY PROFESSOR 2: THE KLUMPS
Reviewed by Harvey Karten Universal Pictures/Imagine Entertainment Director: Peter Segal Writer: Barry W. Blaustein, David Sheffield, Paul Weitz, Chris Weitz Cast: Eddie Murphy, Janet Jackson, Larry Miller, John Ales
Did "The Nutty Professor," directed by 1996 by Tom Shadyac, really need a sequel? If the insatiable demand by the target audience of movies like "Dumber and Dumber" can be whetted by "Nutty 2" and even "Nutty 3" and the box office computers can gobble up all the change that will inevitably arrive, then, sure. The market research suits were probably on target in pushing for a sequel. But since we've already seen in '96 how the special effects guys and cosmetics people did a remarkable job of transforming Eddie Murphy into seven people who can flawlessly interact in the same frame, there's nothing in this second venture that needed to be fashioned. As director Peter Segal pushes for jokes that register only on lowest-common-denominator meters, he misses his opportunity to express some loftier ideas: the notion that people should accept themselves for what they are. After all, doesn't the 400-pound Sherman Klump win the love of the lovely and bright Denice Gains (Janet Jackson) because he is kind, intelligent and humble?
Segal opens the story on a dark dream indulged by the professor, beginning with vows he is taking in a marriage ceremony with the lovely Denice and ending with the scattering of the entire church party when the loud and arrogant Buddy Love springs from his pants. Recall from "Nutty 1" that the massively overweight Sherman had swallowed a serum for re-aligning his genetic structure, which transforms him into a well-toned alter ego, Buddy Love. While the new man is a sight for the sore eyes of any young and beautiful maiden, his personality is conversely obnoxious. This time around, using biology professor Denice Gains's strategy for changing his genetic structure, Sherman is finally able to remove Buddy from within his body, but having done so, Buddy turns on his creator and embarks on a plan to steal Sherman's formula for restoring youth to aging bodies and gain the $150 million offered by a large pharmaceutical company for its rights.
To pull in the large numbers of movie fans who have shown themselves insatiably addicted to toilet jokes, the four writers have implanted a series of occasionally funny but mostly mind-numbing and sit-comish incidents into a sadly fragmented and incoherent script. In one episode perhaps intended to spoof the 1950s sci-fi genre, a giant hamster is created when the professor's youth serum liberates dangerous side effects, a rodent which attacks its enemies by hurling its wastes scattershot into its audience, felling even a policeman with drawn gun as though attacking with the Redcoats' cannonball firepower in "The Patriot." Since the hamster makes love as well as war, it seizes the opportunity to jump the college dean (Larry Miller) while the administrator is attempting to escape, haplessly, while wrapped in a blanket of fur.
But the hamster is not the most irritable character in this splintered, would-be comedy. The prize for that attribute can be shared more or less equally with the Klump family, all of whom are played by Eddie Murphy utilizing the ingenious disguises of Rick Baker's makeup. While much credit need be given to the special effects department for allowing the interaction to take place as though the Klump family were indeed a half dozen separate people, each member of the group competes for the title of most vulgar, and the jury may still be out on whether the hamster has routed the Klumps in that department. Mama and Papa Klump advance a running gag on sexuality, with Mama trying ever-so-hard to turn on her defensive and seemingly reluctant husband in scenes that could remind TV viewers of a similar running gag on "Married...with Children." The octagenarian Grandma Klump in one gross-out scene attempts to seduce young Buddy Love, having surprised the much younger man in the garage of the Klump household: "This must be your lucky night."
While the majority of the audience will probably reject this counsel, director Segal would have done better to emphasize the romance between the obese but charmingly shy Sherman and the lovely woman of his dreams. Both are as intelligent as they are decent and down-to-earth and both deserve far greater time than Segal and his trigger-happy editor, William Kerr, afford them.
Rated PG-13. Running time: 110 minutes. (C) 2000 by Harvey Karten, film_critic@compuserve.com
The review above was posted to the
rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the
review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright
belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due
to ASCII to HTML conversion.
Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews