Journal d'une femme de chambre, Le (1964)

reviewed by
Julia Levin


          LE JOURNAL D'UNE FEMME DE CHAMBRE (DIARY OF A CHAMBERMAID)
                         A film review by Julia Levin
                         Copyright 2001 filmcritic.com
                                filmcritic.com

When this movie was over, I felt frustrated, almost disappointed. But the more I thought about Diary of a Chambermaid, the more I came to admire it.

The themes of obsessive desire, inhibitions imposed by society and ridicule of conventional bourgeois values dominate Buñuel's work, and Diary of a Chambermaid is no exception to that. Unlike some of Buñuel's most surrealistic films (L'Age d'Or, Un Chien Andalou, Belle de Jour), Diary is fairly straightforward. No one but Luis Buñuel can combine so brilliantly sexuality, perversity, and humor against the backdrop of fascism's in France in the early 1920s.

Celestine (Jeanne Moreau), a chic, elegantly dressed Parisian, finds a position of chambermaid in a suburban manor. Her frustration with province -- "The countryside is always a little trite" -- soon proves to be a rather premature conclusion, as she discovers her boss' shoe fetishism, among his other peculiarities. Curiously, Celestine finds Monsieur Rabour's weakness harmless, if not attractive. Moreau has one of those sophisticated faces that give away so much yet reveal so little. With a wicked flicker in her eyes and a smirk playing at the corners of her mouth, Celestine learns very quickly how to wrap everyone around her finger. She is dignified and calm with frigid and stingy Madame Monteil, and playfully dismissive of her husband's sexual flirtations (Michel Piccoli is wonderful at portraying the spineless, trapped husband). Her poise, body language, and facial expressions, especially in the scenes when she discovers Monsieur Rabour's private shoe stock, are delightful to watch, and the restored B&W print makes the best of it.

When Celestine suspects Joseph, Monteil's servant and a devoted right-wing bigot, of a murder, she postpones her return to Paris and decides to investigate the murder on her own. Despite the fact that Celestine goes so far as to frame Joseph, her coming on to him is an example of a truly Buñuelian touch -- ambiguity and perversity. Is she really attracted to the sadist (she was horrified once while watching him slaughter geese) and a murderer, or is she out for the revenge, or perhaps even both? We'll never know, and that's why I adore Buñuel so much -- for him there is always so much more in people than mere characterization.

The rise of nationalism and anti-Semitism in France provides Buñuel with another chance to exhibit his radical, vitriolic, and atheistic view of the world he finds so decadent and devoid of morality. After all, Joseph gets away with the murder and Celestine, an impetuous spirit anticipating the aroma of justice, turns out to be no more than a shrewd opportunist selling herself short to become another Madame Monteil -- a bored bourgeois wife.

RATING:  *****
|------------------------------|
 \ ***** Perfection             \
  \ **** Good, memorable film    \
   \ *** Average, hits and misses \
    \ ** Sub-par on many levels    \
     \ * Unquestionably awful       \
      |------------------------------|
MPAA Rating: NR

Director: Luis Buñuel Producers: Michel Safra, Serge Silberman Writer: Luis Buñuel, Jean-Claude Carrière Starring: Jeanne Moreau, Michel Picolli, Georges Géret, Daniel Ivernel, Françoise Lugagne, Jean Ozenne, Dominique Sauvage --- http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=filmcriticcom&path=subst/video/sellers/amazon-top-100-dvd.html Movie Fiends: Check out Amazon.com's Top 100 Hot DVDs!

Visit filmcritic.com on the Web at http://www.filmcritic.com


The review above was posted to the rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due to ASCII to HTML conversion.

Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews