WAKING THE DEAD (director/writer: Keith Gordon; screenwriters: Robert Dillon/based on the novel by Scott Spencer; cinematographer: Tom Richmond; editor: Jeff Wishengrad; cast: Billy Crudup (Fielding Pierce), Sandra Oh (Kim), Jennifer Connelly (Sarah Williams), Molly Parker (Juliet Beck), Janet McTeer (Caroline Pierce), Paul Hipp (Danny), Hal Holbrook (Isaac Green), Lawrence Z. Dane (Governor Kinosis); Stanley Anderson (Ed Pierce), John Carroll Lynch (Priest) Runtime: 105; USA Films/Polygram; 2000)
Reviewed by Dennis Schwartz
Waking the Dead is based on a novel by Scott Spencer, the screenplay is by Robert Dillon, and it is directed by actor-turned-filmmaker Keith Gordon ("Chocolate Wars"). It's a metaphysical love story with a bit of mystery thrown in. There's also more than a bit of a political allegory to it that holds the film together in an intelligent way, as both of the main characters are motivated by political concerns. One as the idealistic rebel who is an outsider, the other as an insider who wants to change the system from within. The film is set during the 1970s and early 1980s.
The love story is complex and is the heart of this engrossing film, a film that deals with the ambiguities that propel people to be who they are. It's especially pleasing because Jennifer Connelly plays a Catholic activist named Sarah Williams in such a touching way that her innate beauty shines forth as an angelic figure who happens to fall for her opposite, an ambitious politician. It's a relationship filled with all sorts of possible pitfalls. Billy Crudup plays the wheedling Fielding Pierce who's stuck in an empty world of deceit, in a political role much like the Robert Redford character in the Candidate. Both candidates think they can make a difference to help their constituents by going after power positions in the government, even though that can't help noticing how corrupt the system they are willing to serve really is; but, they are still willing to compromise themselves to serve. In Fielding's case he never shows that he's even a liberal, only that he's blinded by an urge to achieve success. The calculating working-class hero has gone to Harvard to be a lawyer, joined the Coast Guard to get out of Vietnam duty and because it'll look good on his resume. Eventually Fielding ends up as a congressional candidate for the Democrat machine and questions his sanity after seeing the love of his life, whom he presumed to be dead, suddenly emerge. He will never be quite sure if what he envisioned was real or a figment of his desires, but his sanity at this point is certainly questionable.
The film opens in 1972 as the young Coast Guard officer goes up to the NYC office of his brother Danny (Paul Hipp), who is a hippie book publisher. Here he is attracted to his brother's new assistant Sarah and they both fall in love; even though, they are miles apart politically. She states: "I want a life that makes sense." He says: "I want to be president." The film wavers back and forth between the following years 1972, 1974, 1982, and1983.
In 1974 the couple live together in Chicago and he attends law school while she works as a church activist, even travelling to Chile for the cause of freedom. The following tragedy that occurs will haunt Fielding in the ensuing years: Sarah is reported dead in a car bomb explosion in Minneapolis while transporting two leftists Chilean refugees.
In 1974 Fielding has been befriended by Chicago power broker for the Democratic machine, Isaac Green (Hal Holbrook), who hooks the Bobby Kennedy lookalike Fielding up in the district attorney's office. Then in 1982 when Fielding is 32 and a bachelor, and going out with the niece of Isaac's, Juliet (Molly Parker), he's offered a chance by the governor to run for congress in a special election. But after getting the nomination Fielding starts to come psychologically apart, imagining that he sees the real Sarah or her ghost following him around wherever he goes. It culminates with Fielding winning the close special election in 1983 and going to Washington, where his mind is made up to do good for his constituents.
I don't really know how great this film is, but it did catch my attention; especially, the way Gordon was able to get his main characters to act out who they were and struggle to make their life and their love viable, despite the different directions they would have to go to get where they wanted to be. There was something soap opera like about this tragic love affair that was not only baffling but sad, yet it was more dramatic than that. We weren't overwhelmed by them as stereotypes, forced into accepting them. I think how we accepted them really relates to our life experiences. I know I felt very comfortable with Jennifer Connelly's performance; I thought it was subtle, soft-spoken, and unforgettably powerful. It was easy for me to relate to her and what she was about without feeling I was presented with a character who was being foisted on me in a "Love Story" tear-jerker way. The film was passionate, intelligent, and real. The best scene is on a subway between Fielding and Sarah -- a single 3 1/2-minute shot -- where they are having a heart to heart talk that seemed so unbelievably real. The Jennifer Connelly character is really the subject of the film and her spirit fills the screen whether she's on it or not. This is because she came across as someone with a real heart and is always haunting us throughout the film because we care about her. We don't really care about him. The two actors were just terrific, giving the story its potency and purpose.
REVIEWED ON 6/7/2001 GRADE: A-
Dennis Schwartz: "Ozus' World Movie Reviews"
http://www.sover.net/~ozus
ozus@sover.net
© ALL RIGHTS RESERVED DENNIS SCHWARTZ
The review above was posted to the
rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the
review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright
belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due
to ASCII to HTML conversion.
Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews