SUCH IS LIFE (Así Es La Vida) (director/writer: Arturo Ripstein; screenwriter: Alicia Paz Garciadiego; cinematographer: Guillermo Granillo; editor: Carlos Puente; cast: Arcelia Ramirez (Julia), Luis Felipe Tovar (Nicolás), Patricia Reyes Spindola (Adela, The Godmother), Ernesto Yanez (Pig), Francesca Guillen (Raquel); Runtime: 98; Filmania Production; 2000-Spain/France/Mexico)
Reviewed by Dennis Schwartz
Filmed by the outstanding Mexican director Arturo Ripstein in digital video on a hand-held camera (the video was later transferred to 35 millimeter). This film has a different look to it, as its color tones are strikingly in browns and soft yellows. Otherwise the film failed to sparkle, as it updated the ancient Greek drama Medea by setting it into Mexico City's barrio where there occurs a low-class family struggle. There was nothing added to it that was novel, except a mariachi band is on hand as a Greek chorus. They added a touch of black humor.
In the Greek drama, Medea's memorable deed was to murder her two children by Jason when he left her to marry a princess.
Here, Julia (Arcelia Ramirez), is an emotionally wrought homeopathic doctor and abortionist, who is torn apart because the one she loves with all her heart and the father of her two children, Nicolás (Luis Felipe Tovar), is a bastard abandoning her to marry a younger woman. He's a slimy, unsuccessful boxer who adheres to a macho philosophy, and has taken up with his equally slimy, obese slumlord's (Yanez) virgin daughter Raquel (Guillen). He plans to marry her tomorrow and also wants to keep the children; and, because they will live in the slumlord's apartment building Julia is being kicked out of her apartment. She's about to lose everything she considers important by tomorrow, and goes into a desperate rant about life's injustice for the rest of the film. She's also fueled to anger against men by her man-hating godmother who would like to castrate all men. The slumlord is aptly called Pig as he is seen walking around the courtyard as if he were a king in a mental institution, dressed in a bathrobe with food or drink in hand.
Ripstein also has a dizzying amount of extra shots of things that don't play exactly into the story but add some arty points he's trying to make about the outside influences facing the alienated Julia. There's a television set constantly playing and appearing on it is an unhappy woman weather reporter who complains about the expected rain; a mariachi band sings a number of boleros and also ballads commenting on Julia's destiny, as they become what goes for a Greek chorus; there's also a porn flick that plays while Nicolás and Raquel are screwing. I wasn't enlightened by these unnecessary scenes, in fact I thought they were pretentious.
Almost the entire film is a boring rant by Julia, where a fine actress like Arcelia Ramirez just over acted and failed to bring the audience over to her side. Her classical story didn't play like great drama, but felt more like soap opera or a tragic headline newspaper story one reads these days of a mother snapping and killing her children for no logical reason. All the drama evaporated from this presentation, as the film's reward seemed to be a visual feast of looking at the interior of an apartment situated in an ugly apartment building's courtyard. Yet this film shouldn't be totally ignored, as the auteur director took chances with this story and was technically innovative as he gave the film a different look to it. That alone should earn him applause for the effort made. At least, his film wasn't stale as most commercial ventures are today.
The overriding fault for this art-house film was that it is not poetic in a story that must be poetic to be felt as drama and not soap opera. It unfortunately comes off as too distant (it's lost in the mundane world for the answers to Julia's problems) for the viewer to empathize with Julia's internal misery. It also suffers from comparison to other Medea presentations--so many great versions of it were put on as plays, plus the film versions by Pasolini and von Trier were far superior.
REVIEWED ON 9/22/2001 GRADE: C+
Dennis Schwartz: "Ozus' World Movie Reviews"
© ALL RIGHTS RESERVED DENNIS SCHWARTZ
http://www.sover.net/~ozus
ozus@sover.net
© ALL RIGHTS RESERVED DENNIS SCHWARTZ
========== X-RAMR-ID: 29568 X-Language: en X-RT-ReviewID: 251151 X-RT-TitleID: 1106518 X-RT-SourceID: 873 X-RT-AuthorID: 1315 X-RT-RatingText: C+
The review above was posted to the
rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the
review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright
belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due
to ASCII to HTML conversion.
Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews