NELL
A film review by Michael John Legeros
Copyright 1995 Michael John Legeros
Directed by Michael Apted
Written by William Nicholson and Mark Handey, from a play by Mark
Handey
Cast Jodie Foster, Liam Neeson, Natasha Richardson, Richard
Libertini
MPAA Rating "PG-13"
Running Time Approximately 110 minutes
Reviewed at Colonial Park Mall, Harrisburg PA (25DEC)
==
Nothing in the first hour of NELL effectively explains what's going on. Sure, we're spoon fed the basics: Appalachian doctor Jerome Lovell (Liam Neeson) is called by the sheriff to a backwoods cabin, the home of a recluse who was thought to have lived alone. She was a stroke victim who had very little contact with the outside world. She also had a daughter that no one knew about--a young woman named Nell (Jodie Foster) who has never known contact with strangers.
They call Nell a "wild child" and immediately consult a psychologist (Natasha Richardson) in Charlotte. She wants Nell in a hospital, Jerry wants Nell to be left alone, and there you go. What does *Nell* want? Why is Jerry interested in her? Why does Richardson talk like she had Reba McEntire as a dialect coach? The script never answers these questions.
Based on a play by Mark Handey, Nell is built around a magnificent plot device: a child reared without any human contact other than her mother. Said child was borne as the result of a rape and so Mom painted a very cruel portrait of the outside world. Mom also suffered multiple strokes and her aphasia affected how the child was taught to speak. (Mom's accent didn't help much either, y'all.)
The scenes for such a story should write themselves. Sheriff discovers cabin. Doctor discovers Nell. Nell discovers civilization. Civilization discovers Nell. Those scenes exist, but they're pieced together in a routine, ambiguous fashion that never explains much of anything. We get plenty of moonlit shots of Nell communing with nature, for example. She dances under the stars and goes swimming buck-naked. It's a very showy performance from Foster that says very little.
Nell speaks through slow, swaying motions, appearing drunk in almost every scene. Why is she acting intoxicated? Only in the last few minutes does Nell reveal the mind that *we* know she's had all along. We've seen her intelligent stares; we know she's smart. The movie needs *less* of her silly swaying and *more* of the characters who are paying attention to her.
Director Michael Apted includes a number of images from inside Nell's mind, which he overuses. How about some scientific mumbo jumbo, instead? Here's a story *filled* with doctors and hospitals, yet no one stops to give a frank explanation of why Nell is behaving in the manner she is.
The film achieves satisfying closure, when Nell gives a courtroom speech that lets her say all the things that she should've said before. Of course, if she had spoken too soon, she would've ruined the suspense. Will the bad doctors study her like a specimen? Will the good doctors fall in love and protect her? Duh, what do you think?
BOTTOM LINE: Great idea for a stupid movie.
Grade: C-
-- Michael J. Legeros Raleigh, North Carolina
.
The review above was posted to the
rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the
review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright
belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due
to ASCII to HTML conversion.
Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews