While You Were Sleeping (1995)

reviewed by
Steve Rhodes


                          WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING
                       A film review by Steve Rhodes
                        Copyright 1995 Steve Rhodes
RATING (0 TO ****):  ***

WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING is a gem of a movie. It tells the tale of a lonely Chicago subway toll collector named Lucy (Sandra Bullock). She dreams of speaking to a dashingly handsome guy called Peter Callahan (Peter Gallagher) who passes by her tollbooth every day without speaking. She lives in a small apartment and her conversations consist of talking to her cat or to local nominal ladies' man and actual slimeball called Joe Jr. (Michael Rispoli).

One cold Christmas day Peter speaks to her, but her mouth turns to mush and she is unable to respond. An unhappy series of events turns her would be lover into a vegetable. While Lucy is checking on him in his comatose state in the hospital, his family (Peter Boyle, Glynis Johns, Micole Mercurio, et. al.) decides that Lucy is Peter's fiance. She is going to tell them the truth, but she falls in love with the whole family and can not bring herself to do it. Jack Warden plays Peter's godfather and the only one who knows Lucy's secret.

The problems really set in when Peter's brother Jack (Bill Pulman) arrives. He suspects Lucy may be a fraud since she is a brunette and not Peter's type. Peter's real girlfriend, Ashley Baily Bacon (Ally Walker) is blond and is a hell-on-wheels type who, as the movie evolves, keeps calling and leaving messages on Peter's answering machine.

WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING is a romantic comedy and although there is tension and suspense about when Peter will wake up and what will he say, it is of minor importance. The real story is the developing love between Lucy and Jack. Pullman plays Jack as a shy and unassertive character who is not quite sure of what to make of Lucy. Bullock plays Lucy as a captivating woman with a winsome smile, but one that you believe might work all day at a tollbooth while dreaming of her Prince Charming. The chemistry between Lucy and Jack develops slowly and naturally as it would with reserved characters of that sort in real life. Rather than kiss they do some serious "leaning" as they call it in the movie.

The writing by Fred Lebow and Dan Sullivan is marvelous. On the one hand we have a romance that comes alive. On the other hand, we have a comedy full of so many great lines that the audience was in a constant state of mirth. My favorite and the audience's was when the family asked Lucy to prove that she really was Peter's fiance. You will have to see the movie to find out how she proved it. The writers also did something unusual. They put in many scenes that were not linked to any other part of the movie. They were there solely to provide some good laughs, and they all worked. My favorite was the paperboy on the ice.

The cast did real ensemble acting. It was as if the cast actually was a family. Even the character of Joe Jr., I thought was well done, and I generally detest characters like that in the movies. One character I wish I had seen more of was the original girlfriend. Her character was so outlandish relative to the sweetness of the others that I wanted to see what she was going to do next.

The coldness of Chicago in winter was a good metaphor for the loneliness of Lucy's life. The scene of the snow around the Callahan family home on the other hand looked so Norman Rockwell and soothing. Quite a contrast. Well done sets by Garreth Stover and beautiful cinematography by Phedon Papamichael. I found myself wondering however why they released what was clearly a Christmas movie in April.

WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING works because of the excellent direction by Jon Turteltaub, the witty writing, and the compelling yet highly reserved acting by Bullock and Pullman. It was edited (Bruce Green) just about right at 1:43. It is rated PG for adult themes. The actors keep all of their clothes on at all times, never say a bad word, and never think a violent thought. I recommend this movie to anyone old enough to be interested in romance, and I award it ***.


**** = One of the top few films of this or any year. A must see film. *** = Excellent show. Look for it. ** = Average movie. Kind of enjoyable. * = Poor show. Don't waste your money. 0 = One of the worst films of this or any year. Totally unbearable.
REVIEWED WRITTEN ON: April 28, 1995

Opinions expressed are mine and not meant to reflect my employer's.


The review above was posted to the rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due to ASCII to HTML conversion.

Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews