Batman Forever (1995)

reviewed by
Christopher Null


                                BATMAN FOREVER
                      A film review by Christopher Null
                       Copyright 1995 Christopher Null

Batman's reins have been turned over from director Tim Burton (now producing) to Joel Schumacher, from lead Michael Keaton to Val Kilmer, and from an old, baroque Gotham to a heavily stylized, kiddie-pop city.

A lot can be said for the idea that the setting of a picture thoroughly controls its tone. What we have in BATMAN FOREVER is an attempt to make Gotham more like Los Angeles, full of neon, black lights, and people sporting primary-color wigs. Unfortunately, something has been lost in translation.

What we lose is the idea of Batman as The Dark Knight. Instead, he spends a large bit of celluloid pontificating about the morality of killing people, telling us like a public service announcement that it won't make things better. Okay, I buy that, but why is Batman telling me this? Batman is supposed to be a kick-ass-and-take-names type of guy, not some lousy pacifist. I don't need to got to the movies for that. The message is entirely out of place. Also lost is a *real* villain ... instead, we get Jim Carrey's over-the-top interpretation of The Riddler, who was always a wuss on the TV show, and Tommy Lee Jones's Harvey Two-Face, who I don't think I've even heard of.

On the subject of villains, Carrey plays Carrey--what more can you say? He's hilarious, obviously made for the role, but the part isn't written well enough to carry the picture alone. Jones is downright awful as Two-Face, mumbling his lines in every scene and trying desperately to live up to the actors with much better parts who refuse to give him even a little piece of the show.

At any rate, here's what the new Batman brings to the table. First and foremost is Chris O'Donnell as Bruce Wayne's young ward, Dick Grayson, a.k.a. Robin. O'Donnell saves the film more often than he saves Batman, proving what a spectacular actor he is, even with a bare-bones role. Also good is Nicole Kidman as Batman's love interest, Dr. Chase Meridian, who ends up psychoanalyzing him out of his costume. It's too bad the love story wasn't written very well.

And that's not all that's poorly written. The plot has enough holes to drive the Batmobile, the Batplane, *and* the Batboat through. Everything is homage to the first two films: the obligatory car chase, workmanlike fight scenes, people discovering Batman's true identity ... yawn. When you see the film, try to guess what will happen next: you'll be right.

Overall, there's very little originality on the screen ... not that you could see it, thanks to a nonexistent first act, some dismal photography (Stephen Goldblatt, out of his element), even worse editing (Dennis Virkler, surprising considering his two Oscar nominations), and some dull, unrealistic digital effects.

Thank God for the self-deprecating humor in the film, with Batman and Robin poking fun at their small screen past. If you watched the series at all, the jokes make the movie worthwhile. Kilmer is good, as usual, as the man behind the mask, and there are a few good action sequences. If you see the film, try to ignore the preaching, pinch yourself awake after the first half hour, and pray that Tim Burton makes a really good movie next to make up for this one.

RATING:  ***
+---------------------------------------+ 
|*     Unquestionably awful             | 
|**    Sub-par on many levels           | 
|***   Average quality, hits and misses | 
|****  Good, memorable film             | 
|***** Perfection                       | 

The review above was posted to the rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due to ASCII to HTML conversion.

Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews