Judge Dredd (1995)

reviewed by
Ed Powell


                               JUDGE DREDD
                       A film review by Ed Powell
                        Copyright 1995 Ed Powell
OVERVIEW
--------

During the Third Millennium (2000-2999 A.D.), the world has undergone some bad times, and is now a desert wasteland. In order to survive, the American people have gathered into four or five gigantic cities, or megacities. To keep order in the megacities, the government is now a police state, and the police are judge, jury, and executioner. They are ... the Judges. (In other words, a generic action/sci-fi movie.)

Judge Joseph Dredd, a genetically-engineered man that is the perfect Judge. He gets wrongly accused of murdering a TV journalist, and somehow manages to find and kill the person who actually did it, causing death and destruction in his wake that no one really seems to mind.

(In other words, a generic action/sci-fi movie.)

Sylvester Stallone plays Judge Dredd.

(In other words, a generic action/sci-fi movie.)

COMPONENT BREAKDOWN
-------------------

* Story and plot Have a mentioned that this is a generic action/sci-fi movie?

Actually, there was a plot, and it wasn't too bad. The story was above average too. Not Oscar material, but not too bad. Whatever it was, it was better than BATMAN FOREVER.

* Writing

The script seems as if it was directly converted from the comic book format. The dialogue was stilted at times, but was overall above average.

* Acting

I thought the best actor in the film was Rob Schnider. In this film, he had a bigger role than he had in DEMOLITION MAN (which, oddly enough, also starred Sly Stallone), and he made the film hilarious when people weren't being shot, blown-up, or insulted.

Sly conveys the emotionless Judge Dredd well enough (although I have not read any of the comic books). The rest of the acting was average.

* Design

The film employed an incredible amount of matte shots and models, which were of high quality, and conveyed the sense of a dark future well. The building models I can best describe as a futuristic, multi-layer "Batman" style.

The weaponry, vehicles (especially the taxis), and other props were quite stylish, and worked well with the film.

* Effects

Really nothing special. Some good computer animation. A few neat visual effects. Buildings blew up real good. Average.

* Direction

Again, average ... nothing special. Won't win any major (or minor) awards, but it was adequate.

* Family value

*This* is the film's shortcoming. This is definitely *not* family material, definitely not for kids. Rare is the scene where someone isn't being shot, blown-up, or insulted. As much as I hate to say it, take your kids to see POCAHONTAS or something. And as always, thank you for not poking my hontas. :-)

OVERALL
-------

If you like fast-paced, blood and gore sci-fi/action flicks, go for it. I was entertained for its 105 minute run-time. This is the average action flick--entertaining, funny, but not Oscar material.

Produced by Edward R. Pressman, directed by Danny Cannon. A Hollywood Pictures release.

RATINGS (out of ten)
--------------------
  Plot/Story:  7
     Writing:  6      
      Acting:  6
      Design:  7
     Effects:  6
   Direction:  5
Family Value:  1
       TOTAL:  38 out of 70  (Overall:  5.429)

(This can't be right, it scored less than BATMAN FOREVER....)

--
Ed Powell, MSTie #27968

The review above was posted to the rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due to ASCII to HTML conversion.

Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews