Philadelphia (1993)

reviewed by
Steve Rhodes


                               PHILADELPHIA
                       A film review by Steve Rhodes
                        Copyright 1995 Steve Rhodes
RATING (0 TO ****):  *** 1/2

Although PHILADELPHIA could have been a better movie, more about this latter, I really liked it, especially for Tom Hank's extremely moving performance as someone dying of AIDS. There are many parts of the movie that I will remember for a long time, but most of all is the courtroom scene where Tom Hanks testifies in his own behalf. Hanks's performance deserves an Oscar, but many other parts of that scene were outstanding. His makeup throughout the movie is chillingly realistic especially how pale he looks at court. I hate cute camera angles, but the choice of having the camera tilted whenever it shows what Hanks is seeing makes you feel sick too. Overall, it really makes you think: there but for the grace of God go I.

There are two other excellent parts of the show. The family, especially his mother played by Joanne Woodward, is loving and stands behind him without being judgmental and the characters in the family are not overdrawn. Another excellent scene is the costume ball. You can really see the love and the happiness even in times of trouble that this group of gay friends have. The script by Ron Nyswaner is outstanding as is the directing by Jonathan Demme. Demme is one of my favorite directors. His long repertoire of wonderful movies include: SILENCE OF THE LAMBS, MARRIED TO THE MOB, SWIMMING TO CAMBODIA, and my personal favorite SOMETHING WILD. I recommend you rent them all many times.

The movie could and should have been even better. The homophobia was over done. The scene in the drug store where someone tried to pick up Denzel Washington starts off fine, but then goes overboard, ditto for the bar scene, Washington's home scene, etc. Also, Washington's character was not well written. He started off hating gay people and by the middle and end of the movie, it was unclear what he thought.

Some scenes were totally ridiculous. Chief among these was the scene where Hanks has to babble a long soliloquy signifying nothing while listening to Opera music. Finally, both lawyers at the trial were too low key for such an important case, and Mary Steenbergen was terribly miscast as she frequently is. Her script was so bad on the other hand, you kind of had to kind of feel sorry for her. She has a very limited range of acting abilities, but seems to be cast in widely differing roles.

PHILADELPHIA runs 2:05 and given all of the material it covers, I don't think it could be made much shorter. It is rated PG-13 for its serious themes. I highly recommend this show to everyone over 12 and award it *** 1/2. Now, go see the movie. The good parts are excellent, and the bad parts can be ignored.


**** = One of the top few films of this or any year. A must see film. *** = Excellent show. Look for it. ** = Average movie. Kind of enjoyable. * = Poor show. Don't waste your money. 0 = One of the worst films of this or any year. Totally unbearable.
REVIEW WRITTEN ON: January 22, 1994

Opinions expressed are mine and not meant to reflect my employer's.


The review above was posted to the rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due to ASCII to HTML conversion.

Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews