Long Kiss Goodnight, The (1996)

reviewed by
Christopher Null


                          The Long Kiss Goodnight (1996)
                        A film review by Christopher Null
                         Copyright 1996 Christopher Null

The much-publicized ballyhoo over THE LONG KISS GOODNIGHT relates largely to the $4 million paid for Shane Black's script. The question everyone is asking is, was it worth it?

Well, yes and no. Opening weekend is sure to bring in moviegoers in droves enthralled by the sight of Geena Davis with a blonde dye-job, but more discriminating viewers will probably be put-off by the plot holes, inconsistencies, and downright silliness of the film. I mean, how many times *can* you outrun an explosion in one film, anyway?

THE LONG KISS GOODNIGHT starts with one hell of an idea -- suburban schoolteacher Samantha (Davis) has had amnesia for eight years, and when an escaped convict tries to kill her after he sees her on television, the truth of her past is slowly revealed. Along with private eye Mitch (Samuel L. Jackson), Samantha discovers the reality of her life -- she is a cold-blooded assassin in the employ of the CIA under deep cover, by the name of Charly.

Things go from bad to worse when everyone apparently wants the resurfaced and now out-of-date Charly out of the picture, and it becomes a game of cat and mouse with Charly's new goal becoming... well, we never really figure that out, but it involves killing a lot of people, and blowing up a lot of stuff.

Jackson is hilarious here in another PULP-y Jules-esque comic relief role, and Davis has the action-star makings of another Sigourney Weaver. And while the film on the whole is one exciting slam-bang actioner (directed by slam-bang director and Mr. Geena Davis, Renny Harlin), it's the glaring bits of incongruity that constantly bother the viewer. The conveniently placed props -- thin ice where it's needed, always a gun handy, kerosene in a child's doll (I still haven't figured that one out) -- and Harlin's insistence in pointing these out well in advance so we won't be scratching our heads when they inevitably enter the picture -- all of this gives the movie the feeling of a methodically-planned operation, executed with the skill of... well, a killer like Charly.

THE LONG KISS GOODNIGHT has other problems, most notably a poor editing job, needed explanatory sequences obviously excised from the film, and a disconcerting similarity of Charly at the end of the film to MacGyver, but what's the point of worrying? In the end, you're likely to remember little but a lot of guns, explosions, and Geena's lovely hair.

RATING:  ***1/2
|------------------------------|
 \ ***** Perfection             \
  \ **** Good, memorable film    \
   \ *** Average, hits and misses \
    \ ** Sub-par on many levels    \
     \ * Unquestionably awful       \
      |------------------------------|

-Christopher Null / null@filmcritic.com / Writer-Producer -Visit the Movie Emporium and Null Set Productions at http://www.filmcritic.com/nullset.htm


The review above was posted to the rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due to ASCII to HTML conversion.

Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews