Contact (1997) ** out of ***** - Cast: Jodie Foster, Matthew McConaughey, James Woods, Tom Skerritt, Angela Bassett, John Hurt, Rob Lowe, David Morse. Written by: James V. Hart and Michael Goldenberg. Based on the novel by: Carl Sagan. Directed by: Robert Zemeckis. Running Time: 150 minutes.
*** This Review Contains Spoilers. ***
"Contact" was one of the movies I was looking forward to the most this summer. I even made arrangements to see it over a week before its release. At this point I've seen it twice. The first time I saw it, I felt that it was just about the most painfully slow, dull, and lifeless film I had ever had the misfortune to sit through in a movie theater. And after the second time? Well, I still don't feel like I've seen a good movie, and it's still awfully dull. But for the most part, it's just extremely disappointing.
Now I'm not extremely disappointed because the film's not another "Independence Day". Most people seem to think that if you don't like "Contact", then you're just a brainless drooler who's only entertained by stuff blowed up real good. Yet there's more explosions in "Contact" than there are in films such as "Sling Blade", "Carried Away", and "Ulee's Gold", all films I've seen recently which are more entertaining that this one. As a matter of fact, there's not a split second of action in any of those films.
Fans of this film have been raving about how intelligent it is. You'd be surprised how many of these "intelligent" fans have sent such childish responses to my opinons of the film, even going as far as saying I should be killed and I should burn in hell because I didn't like it. Is "Contact" intelligent? Sure it is. The basis of the entire film relies heavily on science, math and religion. But does intelligence mean that it will certainly be entertaining? No. Are all the people who dislike the film therefore unintelligent? Absolutely not.
The opening shot of the film, a very lengthy pullback through the entire universe, starts out showing us just how far our own radio and television signals have been able to travel. But it's point is to really give the audience an idea of how vast the universe is. It's a great special effect, both from a sound and a visual aspect.
We then meet astronomer Jodie Foster, who works with SETI, Search for Extra-Terrestial Intelligence. For years and years she works incredibly hard and endures many setbacks in her job of listening for radio signals from the heavens, until one day her lifelong dream is realized... a message from outer space is received.
This discovery sets the world into a frenzy. Well, I suppose it does anyway, since instead of ever seeing a regular average citizen and how it may effect his/her life, we see countless montages of someone channel surfing through what seems like ten different channels of CNN. In their place, I would have much rather seen what effect this would have had on an everyday family, instead of just what all the scientists, politicians, and journalists had to say about it.
Related to that problem by not showing us the reactions of any normal people, many of the film's actual characters aren't developed well enough for my liking. For example, Jodie Foster's team consists of a black guy, a blind guy, a nerdy guy (and they only way you know that is because he always wears a shirt displaying the periodic table of the elements), a young guy who smokes a pipe, and a biker looking guy. Surely there's something these guys could do to give them just a little depth. One of them could have a family and we could find out how they felt about the film's events.
Then there's the "relationship" which develops between Foster and McConaughey thanks to a couple of hours of conversation, the sharing of a Cracker Jack prize, and a quick hop in the sack. That whole thing feels phony and forced, as if the studio demanded that there had to be a love interest subplot somewhere in there just to appease a certain demographic. Then, over four years then go by without either one having contact with the other, but yet when they do reunite, feelings continue to blossom. I would have felt much better if these characters had just met, shared some conversation and debate, then met up again four years later to participate together in a project, and continued their exploration of each other's beliefs.
But the main problem I have with "Contact" is it's length, or really the amount of time spent on the more boring aspects of the story. Now I'm not one of those people who automatically won't like or won't even see it just based on it's running time. My problem with it's length is the same problem I had with the length of 1995's "Heat". That problem is that there's too much needless footage for a great many scenes which have already established their point.
For example, while Foster and McConaughey are in bed together, he asks about her father. She lets him know that he died when she was nine. Fine. But then, moments later she has a lengthy flashback to that event. David Morse (who give his usual excellent performance in yet another miniscule part) has already been well established as her father. What purpose does this serve? Let's just keep going with the story here.
Also, there's just scene after scene of debating the whole "religion vs. science" issue, something which isn't resolved in the film because the argument just can't be resolved in real life either. Obviously scientists usually don't believe in God (not in the traditional sense anyway), and religious people can't fully accept science as an explanation for why things are. It just keeps going on and on, and it's dull.
Then, there are many moments which present very intriguing ideas and situations, but are then immediately dismissed. Or I just feel that certain ideas could have been executed much better. When the signal is received from outer space, it's incredibly frustrating to the viewer. The three characters who discover it all keep talking at the same time, making it impossible to know what anyone is saying. Yes, I understand they're excited, but I want to hear what they are saying, I was interested to find out the details, and disappointed when I couldn't make out what any one character was saying.
After decoding the signal it is discovered that a video signal was also sent. It too is decoded, and revealed to be footage of Adolf Hitler. The scene is played great, the music swells and the characters react to it as the most bizarre and intriguing thing yet, which it most certainly is. Then, two seconds later, it's immediately brushed off. Don't play an idea that interesting up like that if you don't plan on using it for anything. After that brush off we are then treated to a "Forrest Gump"-ish type scene involving Bill Clinton, a horrible concept which not only grinds the film to a screeching halt (it was almost there anyway) but unfortunately dates the movie. Using Clinton, who couldn't be more vague on whatever topic he's really discussing in the clips used, is just unimportant to the film's events. It's not a personal bias on my part mind you, but it's another needless waste of film, which is then repeated several times later.
But the biggest disappointment is the film's final scenes (and no, not because bug eyed monsters don't show up). After the main events of the final scenes, it's thankfully revealed that this whole thing could have been nothing more than an elaborate hoax played on the world by an eccentric billionaire (John Hurt) who had nothing to lose and seemingly plenty of motive and opportunity. When this is exposed, so much now made sense. There were clues to this for the whole movie, and I really felt satisfied now that most of what had just happened twenty minutes earlier may not have happened at all. Unfortunately, a scene then follows which indicates that those events really did occur. The other explanation was much more interesting. I would have rather explored the ramifications of the hoax angle.
Is "Contact" awful? No, but it's not anything special. It's story just doesn't go in directions that are the slightest bit interesting to me. Conceptually it's a good idea, and it's technically well made, the effects are good and the score is nice. But nothing can substitute for a good solid story, and that's where "Contact" is sorely lacking. [PG]
-- Chuck Dowling --
Visit Chuck's Movie Reviews at http://users.southeast.net/~chuckd21/ Over 1,600 movies rated and/or reviewed! Movie news, film related links, and reader's reviews.
The review above was posted to the
rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the
review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright
belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due
to ASCII to HTML conversion.
Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews